2002
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200212000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Healing of Surgical Incisions Created by a Standard “Bovie,” The Utah Medical Epitome Electrode, and a Bard-Parker Cold Scalpel Blade in a Porcine Model: A Pilot Study

Abstract: A comparative study of skin incision healing using a standard "bovie" and a new design electroscalpel, Utah Medical Products Epitome Electrode (Midvale, UT), was conducted in a porcine model. Wounds were evaluated objectively at 14 and 28 days after surgery using wound bursting strength measurements and histologic wound scoring. Each electrosurgical device was compared with wound healing of cold scalpel incisions as the gold standard using the same criteria. Statistical differences of healing between the bovie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Central to their design is the use of continuous-waveform radiofrequency (RF) energy, delivered via an uninsulated metal electrode, to cut tissue by thermal ablation, thus producing a simultaneous hemostatic effect [3,4]. While prized for hemostatic control and dissection capability, conventional electrosurgical devices are associated with significant thermal damage to incised tissues, low surgical precision with the potential for injury to adjacent structures (eg, bowel, nerves, blood vessels), and delayed wound healing [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Central to their design is the use of continuous-waveform radiofrequency (RF) energy, delivered via an uninsulated metal electrode, to cut tissue by thermal ablation, thus producing a simultaneous hemostatic effect [3,4]. While prized for hemostatic control and dissection capability, conventional electrosurgical devices are associated with significant thermal damage to incised tissues, low surgical precision with the potential for injury to adjacent structures (eg, bowel, nerves, blood vessels), and delayed wound healing [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, these limitations have led to improvements in electrosurgical device design including low-stick electrode coatings, ultrasonic blades, sealing technology, and feedback controlled RF generators [6][7][8][9]13]. Some of these innovations have demonstrated incremental improvement in reducing thermal damage during dissection while preserving bleeding control; however, the use of continuous RF energy and a large uninsulated electrode has remained unchanged despite many generations of traditional electrosurgical technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 -12 Consequently, a number of new electrosurgical technologies have been introduced, such as insulated cutting electrodes, ultrasonic blades, and feedback-controlled radiofrequency generators. [5][6][7][8][9]12 Some of these developments have demonstrated incremental improvements in reducing the thermal damage while preserving hemostatic ability. However, substantial room for improvement remains in electrosurgical technology that can approach the surgical precision and favorable wound-healing characteristics of the scalpel while also providing hemostasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we investigated the healing profile of incisions created by a traditional scalpel, conventional electrosurgery, and the PlasmaBlade using an established porcine skin model. 12 We examined objective parameters including blood loss, wound tensile strength, histologic coagulation necrosis, and inflammation. In addition, we evaluated instrument operating temperature, wound cosmesis, and scarring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the surgical procedure was simplified as much as possible; therefore we tend to attribute the histopathological changes to the device used, which was the only difference between groups. Further investigation with Vesalius should be performed on larger animal models such as rabbits or pigs, allowing more complex thoracic procedures and comprehensive evaluation [18] .…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%