2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55726-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomics study reveals Red Sea Bacillus with characteristics associated with potential microbial cell factories (MCFs)

Abstract: Recent advancements in the use of microbial cells for scalable production of industrial enzymes encourage exploring new environments for efficient microbial cell factories (MCFs). Here, through a comparison study, ten newly sequenced Bacillus species, isolated from the Rabigh Harbor Lagoon on the Red Sea shoreline, were evaluated for their potential use as MCFs. Phylogenetic analysis of 40 representative genomes with phylogenetic relevance, including the ten Red Sea species, showed that the Red Sea species com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacillus species frequently occur in chains and cause skin infection. 10,11 As such, antibacterial coatings are needed for dened surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacillus species frequently occur in chains and cause skin infection. 10,11 As such, antibacterial coatings are needed for dened surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gov) using the BLAST service deployed on local servers with the genome obtained sequences and fastANI (Jain et al 2018). The draft genome was most closely related to B. paralicheniformis Bac84 (accession number ASM299392v1) living in sea environment (Othoum et al 2019) (Fan et al 2017). Taxonomic identity of the CCMM B940 strain was also confirmed using the GTDB-Tk tool for genome classification (Chaumeil et al 2020) with 98.95% identity to the B. paralicheniformis KJ-16 genome (accession number ASM104248v2).…”
Section: Genome Research Reportsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Species identity was confirmed by comparing the genome reference sequences of B. licheniformis and Bacillus paralicheniformis available in the NCBI database ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ) using the BLAST service deployed on local servers with the genome obtained sequences and fastANI (Jain et al 2018 ). The draft genome was most closely related to B. paralicheniform is Bac84 (accession number ASM299392v1) living in sea environment (Othoum et al 2019 ) with an ANI value of 98.94%, and shared only 94.36% identity with B. licheniformis DSM 13 T (NC_006270.3). B. aerius CCMM B940 was, therefore, reclassified as B. paralicheniformis CCMM B940, placing it in the B. subtilis group; a group known for its wide array of uses in biotechnology mainly through species like B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Fan et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Genome Research Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, ref. [82] demonstrated the potential of two more Red Sea strains B. paralicheniformis (Bac48) and B. halosaccharovorans (Bac94), which are capable of secreting twice as much protein as the model strain B. subtilis 168. The strain Bac94 was shown to be enriched with genes associated with the Tat and Sec protein secretion system, hence making it a promising system for recombinant protein expression work.…”
Section: Finding Novel Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%