2013
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomics of chemosensory protein genes reveals rapid evolution and positive selection in ant-specific duplicates

Abstract: Gene duplications can have a major role in adaptation, and gene families underlying chemosensation are particularly interesting due to their essential role in chemical recognition of mates, predators and food resources. Social insects add yet another dimension to the study of chemosensory genomics, as the key components of their social life rely on chemical communication. Still, chemosensory gene families are little studied in social insects. Here we annotated chemosensory protein (CSP) genes from seven ant ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
67
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous hypotheses [17, 18], it is primarily a conserved subset of single-copy orthologs which are expressed in ant antennae. In Cerapachys biroi , only one dynamically evolving CSP is expressed specifically in antennae, in contrast to five conserved OBPs and two conserved CSPs showing antenna-specific expression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In contrast to previous hypotheses [17, 18], it is primarily a conserved subset of single-copy orthologs which are expressed in ant antennae. In Cerapachys biroi , only one dynamically evolving CSP is expressed specifically in antennae, in contrast to five conserved OBPs and two conserved CSPs showing antenna-specific expression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Single species studies have been useful in demonstrating identity of recognition cues, and the kinds of selection acting on underlying gene sequences, for example, in fungi (Hall et al ), colonial ascidians (Nydam and De Tomaso ), and Dictyostelium (Benabentos et al ). Similarly, comparisons on broad phylogenetic scales have revealed the evolutionary forces acting on recognition gene families (Gadau et al ; Zhou et al ; Kulmuni and Havukainen ; Kulmuni et al ) and recognition cues (Van Wilgenburg et al ). However, to understand the evolutionary forces acting on phenotypic cue variability, and which cues are informative in which context, patterns of natural variation need to be broadly described with comparative studies of closely related species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another view is that the substitution rates for beneficial and deleterious mutations depend on environmental selection, as well as population size and structure (Gillespie, 1991; Ohta, 1992). For many years, the crucial role of gene and genome duplications (namely, neofunctionalization and subfunctionalization) in governing organismal evolution has been acknowledged (Ohno, 1970; Force et al, 1999; Innan and Kondrashov, 2010; Kulmuni et al, 2013). Only in recent decades has great attention been paid to the molecular mechanisms of gene loss (deletion or pseudogenization) as a pervasive source of genetic change, which is believed to be another key evolutionary event that causes adaptive phenotypic diversity (Albalat and Cañestro, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%