1980
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(80)90086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative frequency analysis of single EEG - Evoked potential records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have concluded that the averaged ERP emerges as the result of stimulus induced phase-resetting of ongoing oscillatory rhythms (Basar, 1980, Brandt et al, 1991, Makeig et al, 2002, Jansen et al, 2003, Klimesch et al, 2004, Gruber et al, 2005, Hanslmayr et al, 2007, Klimesch et al, 2007a,c), while others have supported the view that new stimulus-evoked neural activity is added to the spontaneously ongoing oscillations (Fell et al, 2004, Shah et al, 2004, Makinen et al, 2005, Mazaheri and Jensen, 2006, Becker et al, 2008). As both phase synchronization of ongoing oscillations and the addition of time-locked neural activity would increase post-stimulus phase consistency, it is not always easy to discriminate which of these is the primary mechanism of ERP generation (Yeung et al, 2004, Sauseng et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have concluded that the averaged ERP emerges as the result of stimulus induced phase-resetting of ongoing oscillatory rhythms (Basar, 1980, Brandt et al, 1991, Makeig et al, 2002, Jansen et al, 2003, Klimesch et al, 2004, Gruber et al, 2005, Hanslmayr et al, 2007, Klimesch et al, 2007a,c), while others have supported the view that new stimulus-evoked neural activity is added to the spontaneously ongoing oscillations (Fell et al, 2004, Shah et al, 2004, Makinen et al, 2005, Mazaheri and Jensen, 2006, Becker et al, 2008). As both phase synchronization of ongoing oscillations and the addition of time-locked neural activity would increase post-stimulus phase consistency, it is not always easy to discriminate which of these is the primary mechanism of ERP generation (Yeung et al, 2004, Sauseng et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unequivocal situation has been described for the N1 component of the auditory [10,5] and visual evoked potentials [34,9]. The second, more complex situation is described as phase resetting with enhancement during which the sensory stimulation induces an increase in EEG amplitude in addition to phase resetting [6]. In this case, it is not possible to distinguish the activity generated by phasic neural events (independent of spontaneous EEG) from those linked to EEG phase resetting [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternative view (oscillation model) suggested by pioneer experiments [4,5] pointed out the fact that evoked potentials might result from phase-locking or phase-reset of the basic EEG rhythms within specific frequency bands, as a response to external stimulation [6]. Evidence of stimulus-induced phase-locking has been reported by several groups, using a variety of signal analysis methods [7-12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This neurological response to a salient event can also modify oscillatory activity by “phase re-ordering” or realignment of background EEG frequency bands [5, 6]. This time-locked synchronization of oscillatory activity is termed an event-related oscillation (ERO) [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%