2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00986.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative fitness assessment of Anopheles stephensi transgenic lines receptive to site‐specific integration

Abstract: Genetically-modified mosquitoes that are unable to transmit pathogens offer opportunities for controlling vector-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue. Site-specific gene recombination technologies are advantageous in the development of these insects because anti-pathogen effector genes can be inserted at integration sites in the genome that cause the least alteration in mosquito fitness. Here we describe Anopheles stephensi transgenic lines containing φC31 attP "docking" sites linked to a fluorescent mark… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Technologies used thus far are based on the random integration of transposable elements into the genome; such insertions must be thoroughly characterized with respect to effects on both the fitness of the mosquito (41,42) and the stability/expression of the transgene (43). Although some of this effort can be reduced by reusing integration sites via ΦC31 gene targeting (23,43,44), this still leaves a relatively small portion of the genome currently accessible to manipulation, namely those few regions that have accepted a transposon integration and have been determined to have few undesired effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies used thus far are based on the random integration of transposable elements into the genome; such insertions must be thoroughly characterized with respect to effects on both the fitness of the mosquito (41,42) and the stability/expression of the transgene (43). Although some of this effort can be reduced by reusing integration sites via ΦC31 gene targeting (23,43,44), this still leaves a relatively small portion of the genome currently accessible to manipulation, namely those few regions that have accepted a transposon integration and have been determined to have few undesired effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results support the conclusion that the exogenously derived gypsy insulator-like DNA is functional in this mosquito and contributes to higher and more consistent transgene mRNA abundance. Mosquito embryos from docking lines 44C and 20 containing attP sites for φC31 integrase (18,40) differences were seen in the normalized abundance of DsRed mRNA between each gypsy-containing corresponding pair, although the values in 44C #12 were consistently 9-12% higher than 44C #P2 ( Fig. 4; Tables S3-S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…stephensi ( Fig. 1) (18,40). The recipient lines were selected because they have single docking-site transgene insertions at different places in the genome and vary visually in the intensity and distribution of their CFP phenotype (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…stephensi transgenic lines containing phi C31 attP 'docking' sites and expressing ECFP. (Amenya et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%