2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2007
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2007.356965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Voxel Similarity Measures for Affine Registration of Diffusion Tensor MR Images

Abstract: Deriving an accurate cost function for tensor valued data has been one of the main difficulties in diffusion tensor image (DTI) registration. In this work, we evaluate and compare five voxel similarity measures: Euclidean distance (ED), LogEuclidean distance (LOG), distance based on diffusion profiles (DP), diffusion mode based similarity (MBS), and multichannel version of sum of squared differences (SSD). In evaluation we used an optimization-independent evaluation protocol to assess the capture range, the nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Pure rotational transformation Formally, y = Rx (25) R is a rotation matrix. Since the rotation matrix R represents a linear transformation:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) Pure rotational transformation Formally, y = Rx (25) R is a rotation matrix. Since the rotation matrix R represents a linear transformation:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directional and magnitude information are weighted differently depending on the type of diffusion. A few of these tensor based metrics were evaluated and compared in [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by [14], we model the diffusivity function as a probability density function (pdf), by normalizing its integral over the spherical angle Ω to 1: (2) where gtr is the generalized trace of D [14]. For two diffusivity functions D p and D q , we define the symmetric KL-divergence based on the corresponding pdfs p(θ, φ) and q(θ, φ): (3) Applying Eq (2) to the integrals in Eq (3), for example, (4) we then have (5) Direct estimation of sKL in Eq (5) is computationally expensive, but is faster if we expand the diffusivity functions D(θ, φ) as a spherical harmonic (SH) series [9,10]: (6) here are the associated Legendre polynomials. D(θ, φ) is real and radially symmetric, so it is sufficient to adopt a real basis function set Y lm while retaining the orthonormality of [10]:…”
Section: Kullback-leibler Divergence Of Two Diffusivity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusivity profiles can be resolved more clearly in brain regions where fiber tracts cross, providing more accurate information for fiber-tracking (tractography), disease detection, and analysis of anatomical connectivity. differences (SSD) [5]. Here we evaluate a new information-theoretic metric, the symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence (sKL-divergence), for measuring differences between diffusivity profiles in HARDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance or similarity between a native image and a template can be represented by the Euclidean difference [ 15 ]. The Euclidean difference would arise with increasing differences of images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%