2011
DOI: 10.5120/2524-3432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Ultrasound Kidney Image Enhancement Techniques

Abstract: Evaluation have been done to different enhancement techniques applied to ultrasound kidney images to see which enhancement techniques is the most suitable techniques that can be applied to the kidney images before segmenting the edge of the kidney. Five common enhancement techniques have been used including the spatial domain filtering, frequency domain filtering, histogram processing, morphological filtering and wavelet filtering. The techniques applied were assessed by few methods which are the observer sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has defeated the drawbacks of the wavelet transform in the image noise and has solved the sparsity problem of smooth edge target (Hafizah and Supriyanto, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has defeated the drawbacks of the wavelet transform in the image noise and has solved the sparsity problem of smooth edge target (Hafizah and Supriyanto, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] the various filters for SAR images are compared with Wavelet Soft Thresholding in terms of MSE and ENL. In [3] the comparative evaluation was performed on ultrasound kidney images with various Spatial Domain Filters, Frequency Domain Filters, Morphological Processing and Wavelet Filters based on MSE and PSNR. The Morphological Filter performs better in terms of PSNR means that valuable signal component is present in the denoised image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histogram equalization is used to improve the visual appearance of an image by adjusting the image histogram [11], [12] . Fig.…”
Section: ) Histogram Equalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%