2020
DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:2020.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation Of Two Techniques Of Sex Determination In Lovebirds (Agapornis Spp.)

Abstract: Most lovebirds (Agapornis spp.) have no distinct sexual dimorphic traits. The objective of the paper was to compare the results of two sexing methods, surgical sexing by celioscopy and DNA sexing by PCR from blood samples, in order to evaluate their effectiveness. Materials used to carry out the studies were a 2.7 mm telescope and endoscopy unit, surgical instruments and DNA sampling kits provided by Exomed.cz laboratory. Forty-two lovebirds were included in this study. The endoscopic sexing procedure was perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCR technique has high sensitivity, can be performed at all ages from juvenile to adults, and even could identify the sexes using the eggshell membrane as a DNA sample (Begović et al, 2017;Akrom et al, 2020;Yuda and Saputra, 2021;Turcu et al, 2023). PCR technique has advantages over conventional methods such as external morphological observation, vent sexing, laparoscopy, karyotyping, faecal sexing steroids, and ultrasound for oviduct identification (Khaerunnisa et al, 2013;Casana et al, 2019;Turcu et al, 2020;Hidayat et al, 2021). Those conventional methods above tend to have weaknesses, such as requiring a long time, experience, special expertise and invasive (Volodin et al, 2015;Purwaningrum et al, 2019;Elnomrosy et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCR technique has high sensitivity, can be performed at all ages from juvenile to adults, and even could identify the sexes using the eggshell membrane as a DNA sample (Begović et al, 2017;Akrom et al, 2020;Yuda and Saputra, 2021;Turcu et al, 2023). PCR technique has advantages over conventional methods such as external morphological observation, vent sexing, laparoscopy, karyotyping, faecal sexing steroids, and ultrasound for oviduct identification (Khaerunnisa et al, 2013;Casana et al, 2019;Turcu et al, 2020;Hidayat et al, 2021). Those conventional methods above tend to have weaknesses, such as requiring a long time, experience, special expertise and invasive (Volodin et al, 2015;Purwaningrum et al, 2019;Elnomrosy et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%