2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the Vitek-2 Compact and Phoenix systems for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing directly from blood cultures of Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
70
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
70
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data indicated that the Vitek 2 system provided inaccurate susceptibility test results for oxacillin and vancomycin, as the agreement rate with the reference method was very low, and the error rates, mainly VMEs and MEs, were higher compared to other studies 14 . Although our study has evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly isolated strains, such as S. aureus and E. faecalis, most of the isolates were microorganisms that belong to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and non-faecalis enterococci.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Our data indicated that the Vitek 2 system provided inaccurate susceptibility test results for oxacillin and vancomycin, as the agreement rate with the reference method was very low, and the error rates, mainly VMEs and MEs, were higher compared to other studies 14 . Although our study has evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly isolated strains, such as S. aureus and E. faecalis, most of the isolates were microorganisms that belong to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and non-faecalis enterococci.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Timely intervention in the treatment of bloodstream infection is of high significance to provide precise antimicrobial [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the direct inoculation of growthpositive blood culture broth into automated biochemical typing systems has been described to reduce reporting turnaround times (Chen et al, 2008;Gherardi et al, 2012). However, both of these methods appear to perform less well in the identification of Gram-positive organisms as compared with that of Gram-negative organisms (Chen et al, 2008;Prod'hom et al, 2010;Kok et al, 2011;Gherardi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%