2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500214050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of multi‐polarized multi‐frequency SAR backscatter to plant density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the figure, it can be seen that the values of the backscattering coefficient change ~6 dB from normal condition (green) to burned condition (red). This increase in the observed σ 0 values with increasing vegetation density is not unexpected, and it was also observed for natural vegetation in [17] and for crops in [18]. Since the images ENL is ~21, this change cannot be attributed to speckle fluctuations, and should be related to changes in the phenological/hydrological condition of the marsh.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Reduction Of Junco Plant Densitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…From the figure, it can be seen that the values of the backscattering coefficient change ~6 dB from normal condition (green) to burned condition (red). This increase in the observed σ 0 values with increasing vegetation density is not unexpected, and it was also observed for natural vegetation in [17] and for crops in [18]. Since the images ENL is ~21, this change cannot be attributed to speckle fluctuations, and should be related to changes in the phenological/hydrological condition of the marsh.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Reduction Of Junco Plant Densitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This points to the possibility to classify shrub vegetation in other sub-Arctic regions, but further testing would be necessary, especially in environments where wetlands are more prevalent, as this type of land cover is very complex and caused the most problems in the current study. Furthermore, looking at the results shown in [22][23][24][25], it seems that polarimetric SAR data could be used to classify shrub vegetation cover in arid and semi-arid environments using a similar method. In these cases, however, the effects of seasonality might not be as apparent as the current study, and the temporal contrasts might be more related to rainfall and soil moisture cycles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have certain limitations as the field sampling methods can be very costly and do not provide a high spatial coverage, while satellite imagery in the visible and infrared spectrum is affected by the presence of clouds, which can be persistent in northern regions [16,21]. Previous studies have shown that SAR imagery can be a suitable tool to detect, quantify and map shrub vegetation, but mostly in arid or semi-arid environments [22][23][24][25]. More recently, it has been demonstrated that C-and X-band SAR backscattering is sensitive to shrub height in sub-Arctic environments [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the numerator (i.e., VH − VV) reflects the depolarization ratio described in [56]. Due to its sensitivity to surface roughness, as well as vegetation structure and dry biomass [57,58], it has proven useful for discriminating between bare and forested surfaces [59], and as an important input parameter in soil moisture retrieval [60].…”
Section: Radar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%