2021
DOI: 10.54527/jdir.2021.40.2.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the microbial leakage at two different implant-abutment interfaces using a new sealant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of sandblasting materials where hydroxyapatite was also used, following the SEM microscopic analysis presented in Figure 7 to Figure 14, one may observe, that, although Calcium and Phosphorus are clearly identified for both Ti and Ti alloy (Figure 8 and Figure 12), there are as minute traces (Figure 9, 10,13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of sandblasting materials where hydroxyapatite was also used, following the SEM microscopic analysis presented in Figure 7 to Figure 14, one may observe, that, although Calcium and Phosphorus are clearly identified for both Ti and Ti alloy (Figure 8 and Figure 12), there are as minute traces (Figure 9, 10,13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The importance of sandblasting resides in its inherent properties and outcome: enhanced surface roughness and increased surface area, essential for mechanical interlocking between the implant, abutment, and restorative material, thorough surface cleanliness, as most of the manufacturing contaminants such as oils, oxides, and residues are removed, increase wettability, effective mechanical retention, due to the increased friction forces [1][2][3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations