2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201800152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of the Fatty Acids and Aroma Compounds in Selected Iranian Nut Oils

Abstract: The aroma and fatty acid compositions of selected Iranian nut oils including bitter almond, sweet almond, walnut, and hazelnut oils are analyzed. The volatile compounds are extracted using purge and trap extraction and identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). In total, 21, 24, 25, and 37 aroma compounds are detected in extracts of bitter almond, sweet almond, walnut, and hazelnut oils, respectively. A total of 54 different volatile compounds composed of aldehydes, alcohols, terpenes, carboxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The freshness (low level of rancidity) of all four almond samples was confirmed by the low content of hexanal and nonanal found [44,45]. Both hexanal and nonanal values showed no statistical significant differences among treatments, as well as a low content of hexanal and a similar content of nonanal when compared to the literature [46].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The freshness (low level of rancidity) of all four almond samples was confirmed by the low content of hexanal and nonanal found [44,45]. Both hexanal and nonanal values showed no statistical significant differences among treatments, as well as a low content of hexanal and a similar content of nonanal when compared to the literature [46].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Benzaldehyde, benzoic acid, and benzyl alcohol, which impart a characteristic flavor to almond oil, are the volatile substances peculiar to BAO. The result is consistent with that reported in literature …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…4‐Nonanol was used as an internal standard in the extractions because it fulfilled all necessary criteria as an internal standard. A combination between experimental calibration by internal standards and FID response factors prediction was carried out according to de Saint Laumer et al Each procedure was repeated in triplicate and the concentration of volatiles was expressed by 4‐nonanol as an internal standard (with the concentration of 43.27 mg kg −1 ) equivalent . Therefore, the quantification was calculated via the equation below which was also used in our previous study Ci=true(normalAnormali/normalAnormalsnormaltnormaldtrue)×Cstd×RF×CF where Ci: concentration of compound; Ai: peak area of compound; Astd: peak area of internal standard; Cstd: concentration of internal standard (5 mL/l00 mL); RF: response factor; and CF: calculation factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination between experimental calibration by internal standards and FID response factors prediction was carried out according to de Saint Laumer et al [14] Each procedure was repeated in triplicate and the concentration of volatiles was expressed by 4-nonanol as an internal standard (with the concentration of 43.27 mg kg À1 ) equivalent. [15] Therefore, the quantification was calculated via the equation below which was also used in our previous study…”
Section: Gc-ms-olfactometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%