2017
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Laser Etching on the Shear Bond Strength of Crowns Cemented with Two Different Luting Agents: An In Vitro Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously done studies have proved that the treatment with laser results in an anfractuous surface (fractured and uneven) which leads to better bonding of cement. [ 21 22 23 ] SEM evaluation of representative specimens of Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin in this study also demonstrated the complete removal of smear layer and opened dentinal tubules orifices. Similar findings were also observed in the study carried out by Hossain et al [ 24 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previously done studies have proved that the treatment with laser results in an anfractuous surface (fractured and uneven) which leads to better bonding of cement. [ 21 22 23 ] SEM evaluation of representative specimens of Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin in this study also demonstrated the complete removal of smear layer and opened dentinal tubules orifices. Similar findings were also observed in the study carried out by Hossain et al [ 24 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, the bonding effectiveness of these functional monomers relies largely on the chemical interaction with dental HAp, which is lower and less stable compared to that promoted by 10-MDP monomer 48 . These facts may explain why Vertise® Flow and Fusio™ Liquid Dentin used without prior phosphoric acid etching performed significantly worse than CFRCs 8,9,20,21,30,36 Other strategies to improve the bonding effectiveness of adhesive restorations involve lasers such as erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Er:YAG) or neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 49,50 . This was confirmed in one included study 30 using Er:YAG laser (120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.20 W) at 1 mm of distance from primary enamel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%