2018
DOI: 10.37358/mp.18.3.5045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Polishing of a Glaze/composite Sealant and Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Three Composite Resin Type

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of different techniques of finishing and polishing as well as the use of sealants on the surface condition of some composite resins used in the dental office. 80 specimens of composite materials (Nanoceramic, Nanocomposit and Nanohybrid) were made and divided into 3 groups G1-coated composite with sealant lacquer, G2 - finished in 2 stages, and G3 - finished in 3 stages. Roughness (Ra) was determined with the Taylor Hobson Form Talysurf Profiometer. The data w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researches proved the remineralization of white-spot carious lesions on smooth enamel surfaces with direct access to saliva with normal pH and high calcium and phosphate ions concentration [2,3]. The early detection of the proximal enamel demineralization offers the possibility for non-invasive or minimal invasive interventions based on fluoridation [4], applications of remineralization products [5], or infiltration (ICON method) [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researches proved the remineralization of white-spot carious lesions on smooth enamel surfaces with direct access to saliva with normal pH and high calcium and phosphate ions concentration [2,3]. The early detection of the proximal enamel demineralization offers the possibility for non-invasive or minimal invasive interventions based on fluoridation [4], applications of remineralization products [5], or infiltration (ICON method) [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%