Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials

Tandon, Arpita; Bulbule, Nilesh; Jagtap, Amit; Kakade, Dilip

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2018/36235.12296

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This means that greater dimensional changes are predicted for impression material used in group I. Additionally, greater freedom in movement is expected for the splinting bar used in group I during impression retrieval from the patients' mouths. These predictions added to the limitations of the resin-on-floss techniques (19)(20)(21)(22) might favor using the suggested modifications done in group II of this study.…”

Section: Epoxy Model Group Imentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Despite the high precision values obtained by resin on dental floss splinting (5) , this procedure, especially in case of full-arch implant restorations, are not ideal because of the extended working time and the need for a second appointment (18) . Other drawbacks were also evident including need for a custom tray with additional spacer to accommodate for the splint as well as the dental structures being recorded, and injection of the impression material underneath the splint is mandatory to ensure complete registration of the details beneath the constructed splint (19)(20)(21)(22) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Digital evaluation of a simplified technique for resin splinting used for multiunit implant restoration impressions: An in-vitro comparative study

ElDakkak

Neena

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study aims to simplify the conventional resin-on-floss splinting technique and study the precision of this modified multiimplant impression technique.Material and Methods: Twenty-four (n=24) impressions were done for one mandibular completely edentulous model with six implants placed at the canines, first premolars and first molars. Group I (n=12) used the sectional resin-on-floss splinting technique. Group II (n=12) used the simplified tray-resin splint technique. The reference model and casts were scanned. Obtained STLs were aligned. Virtual implants on each cast were compared to reference model measuring angular and positional deviations. All variables and were compared at p value <.05.Results: Group I had significantly lower differences in angular deviations in vertical and horizontal axes of each implant except the left first molar implant, vertically, and the left first premolar implant, horizontally. The overall angular deviations of all implants were significantly lower in group I at the vertical axis. Group I had significantly lower positional deviations in XY axes of each implant except the left first molar implant. Group I showed significantly lower values on the left canine and left first premolar implant in the Z axis. The overall positional deviations of each implant of group I were significantly lower on the left canine and right first molar implants. The overall positional deviations of all implants were significantly lower in group I at the XY axes.Conclusions: Conventional resin-on-floss technique showed less deviation values. Values of both techniques remained within the accepted level of clinical misfit values proposed in literature.

show abstract

Section: Epoxy Model Group Imentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital evaluation of a simplified technique for resin splinting used for multiunit implant restoration impressions: An in-vitro comparative study

ElDakkak

Neena

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…20 As time progressed from 1980, implants were modified in design as well as texture. 8 Similarly, for prosthetic materials, the adoption of alternate biomimetic materials with higher mechanical qualities and clinical longevity has become a demand in the dental field. Synthetic biomaterials like PTFE have significant advantages.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 The prognosis of implant prostheses with different attachments is expected to be good, with a success rate of 97%-99%, but failures also occur. 8 Attachments are also associated with mechanical or biological complications. 3 For the longevity and maintenance of prostheses, hygiene maintenance is extremely important.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fatigue Resistance of Two Different Materials Used as Retentive Attachments in Implant Supported Overdenture after Immersion in Denture Cleansing Solution: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Shinde

Bulbule

Bhatt

et al. 2023

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This in vitro study compared the fatigue resistance of two polymeric materials (Nylon and Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)) used as retentive attachments in implant-retained overdentures after immersion in denture cleansing solution. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 samples (N=24), of which 12 capsule-shaped samples of commercially available nylon material from ADIN dental implants, India, and similar sized and shaped 12 PTFE (medical grade) capsules custom fabricated from AAA Industries, Mumbai was obtained. Six samples of each material were immersed in distilled water and six samples in Clinsodent denture cleanser, simulating an 8–h daily immersion of the denture for a period of 2 years. After completion of the immersion protocol, samples were subjected to 2900 fatigue cycles using the Universal Testing Machine (UTM), simulating 4 cycles per day of removal and insertion of the overdenture for a duration of 2 years. Before and after immersion, the wear of the samples was assessed for internal and external diameter changes using the Sipcon Inspection System. The statistical analysis of the obtained results was tested by applying the paired-t test, Fisher analysis of variance, and Tukey’s honest significant difference test, with a probability value less than 0.05 used as statistically significant. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed after immersion in denture cleanser for nylon and PTFE. The greatest fatigue for ID, IHL, and IVL was demonstrated in nylon immersed in Clinsodent at p = .000. ED and EHL of PTFE in distilled water showed greater deformation than others ( p = .000). Conclusion: PTFE attachments have shown better fatigue resistance after immersion in Clinsodent denture cleanser. Nylon material immersed in distilled water as well as in Clinsodent cleanser showed greater deformation after fatigue cycles.

show abstract

Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study

Khan¹,

Singh²,

Neyaz³

et al. 2021

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Closed Tray and Open Tray Impression Technique for Dental Implants using Two Different Impression Materials

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Digital evaluation of a simplified technique for resin splinting used for multiunit implant restoration impressions: An in-vitro comparative study

Digital evaluation of a simplified technique for resin splinting used for multiunit implant restoration impressions: An in-vitro comparative study

Fatigue Resistance of Two Different Materials Used as Retentive Attachments in Implant Supported Overdenture after Immersion in Denture Cleansing Solution: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About