2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor™ Ultrasensitive Test, the new Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor™ Ultrasensitive Test and the Versant HIV RNA 3.0 assays for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, less-significant viremia differences among tests occurred when only clade B viruses were tested, as was observed in comparisons of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test and the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test using manual specimen preparation (1). However, disagreement in viremia quantification between two versions of the same assay has been reported testing non-B subtypes (2,7,15). According to all of these data, we strongly suggest measuring all HIV-1 viral load determinations in each HIV-1-infected patient during follow-up by the same quantification technique and version.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, less-significant viremia differences among tests occurred when only clade B viruses were tested, as was observed in comparisons of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Ultrasensitive Test and the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test using manual specimen preparation (1). However, disagreement in viremia quantification between two versions of the same assay has been reported testing non-B subtypes (2,7,15). According to all of these data, we strongly suggest measuring all HIV-1 viral load determinations in each HIV-1-infected patient during follow-up by the same quantification technique and version.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A significant advantage of the COBAS ® AmpliPrep/ COBAS ® TaqMan ® HIV-1 Test is the broad measuring range of 40-1.0E+07 cp/mL. This greater than 5 log 10 range significantly extends the 3 log 10 measuring ranges of the standard semi-automated HIS and HIM tests (Murphy et al, 2000) as well as those of the automated PHS and PHM tests (Berger et al, 2005) and is also superior to the 4 log 10 measuring range of the bDNA assay (Elbeik et al, 2000). Thus, the COBAS ® AmpliPrep/COBAS ® TaqMan ® HIV-1 Test excellently accomplishes the diagnostic requirements for reliable quantification of clinical HIV-1 samples of untreated patients as well as of patients undergoing therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The linear range of the HIS is 50-7.5E+04 cp/mL, requiring 500 L of plasma, whereas the linear range of the HIM is 400-7.5E+05 cp/mL, requiring 200 L of plasma (Murphy et al, 2000). COBAS ® AmpliPrep/COBAS ® AMPLICOR ® HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5 (PHS/PHM) is an integrated assay combining the COBAS ® AmpliPrep Instrument for automated sample preparation with the COBAS ® AMPLICOR ® for amplification and detection (Berger et al, 2002(Berger et al, , 2005. Briefly, HIV-1 RNA and the initially added QS are isolated from samples and controls in an automated specimen preparation process by using biotinylated capture probes specific for HIV-1 RNA.…”
Section: Technical System and Methods Of Hiv-1 Rna Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The newer versions of the Amplicor and Quantiplex (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA, and Bayer Diagnostics, Walpole, MA, USA, respectively) assays have overcome initial suboptimum performance for non-B subtypes. 102 While the viral load determines the rate of destruction of the immune system, the number of CD4+ cells reveals the degree of immunodeficiency and is, therefore, used to assess the stage of infection. CD4+ cell counts together with clinical manifestations (eg, occurrence of opportunistic infections) are key criteria for HIV-1 disease classification.…”
Section: Clinical Management Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%