Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of natural extracts of Morinda citrifolia, papain and aloe vera (all in gel formulation), 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide, against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study
Abstract:Aim:A comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of natural extracts of Morinda citrifolia, papain, and aloe vera (all in gel formulations), 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide, against Enterococcus faecalis—an in vitro study.Materials and Methods:The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed in vitro using dentin shavings collected at 2 depths of 200 and 400 μm. The total colony forming units at the end of 1, 3, and 5 days were assessed.Results:The overall percentage inhibition of bacterial growth … Show more
“…Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) Considering the proteolytic characteristic described for papain and the biopolymer matrix composition of bacterial biofilms, this study aimed to evaluate the ability of papain to act as an inhibitor of biofilms in different concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) found this activity for Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa only in 10% of papain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies reported papain antibacterial activity in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012). Nonetheless, Ferreira et al (2008) verified that only papain gel 10% was able to inhibit S. aureus.…”
Section: Determination Of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (Mic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, biofilms can also be found in wounds, which makes the treatment more difficult and increases wound bioburden (Kim, Steinberg, 2012;Percival et al, 2012;Dowd, 2008). Moreover, previous experimental and clinical data have recommended using papain to reduce wound bioburden and to promote wound healing (Payne et al, 2008).Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) Considering the proteolytic characteristic described for papain and the biopolymer matrix composition of bacterial biofilms, this study aimed to evaluate the ability of papain to act as an inhibitor of biofilms in different concentrations.…”
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus (MRSHa) are important coagulase-negative staphylococci. They are often isolated from bacteremia in humans mainly due to their ability to form biofilm on the surfaces of medical devices. Papain is a complex mixture of proteolytic enzymes and peroxidases extracted from the latex of Carica papaya and it is recognized by accelerating the healing process of wounds. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the MRSE and MRSHa isolates to produce biofilms. Besides this, the ability of papain to inhibit the formation of biofilms or to disrupt the ones already formed by those bacteria was analyzed. Thirty MRSHa and 30 MRSE were isolated from bacteremia and used in this study. It was observed that papain has ability to reduce biofilms formed by MRSE (p < 0.06) and by MRSHa (p = 0.0005). In addition, papain was able to disrupt mature biofilms made by MRSE (p = 0.014). No antibacterial activity of papain was observed for any isolates of MRSE and MRSHa tested. Papain has been demonstrated as a potential product for reducing biofilm.
Uniterms:Staphylococcus epidermidis/methicillin-resistant. Staphylococcus haemolyticus/methicillinresistant. Biofilm/production. Papain/reducing biofilm.Staphylococcus epidermidis resistente à meticilina (MRSE) e Staphylococcus haemolyticus resistente à meticilina (MRSHa) são importantes estafilococos coagulase negativa. São frequentemente isolados em bacteremia humana, principalmente devido à capacidade de formar biofilmes nas superfícies de dispositivos médicos introduzidos no organismo. A papaína é mistura complexa de enzimas proteolíticas e peroxidases extraídas do látex de Carica papaya, reconhecida por acelerar os processos de cura de feridas. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a capacidade dos MRSE e MRSHa em produzir biofilmes e analisar a capacidade da papaína em inibir a formação de biofilme ou desintegrar biofilmes já formados por essas bactérias. Observou-se que a papaína tem capacidade de reduzir a formação de biofilme por MRSE (p < 0,06) e MRSHa (p = 0,0005). Além disso, a papaína foi capaz de desintegrar biofilme maduro formado por MRSE (p = 0,014). Nenhuma atividade antibacteriana da papaína foi observada para qualquer das duas espécies de bactérias testadas. A papaína mostrou-se produto potencial para reduzir biofilme.Unitermos: Papaína. Staphylococcus epidermidis/resistente à meticilina. Staphylococcus haemolyticus/ resistente à meticilina. Biofilme/produção. Papaína/redução de biofilme.
INTRODUCTIONCoagulase-negative staphylococci, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis followed by Staphylococcus haemolyticus, have been frequently reported as significant etiological agents that cause nosocomial infections (Keim et al., 2011, Kristóf et al., 2011Rosado, Romanelli, Camargos, 2011). The most important property of these staphylococci is their capability to form biofilm on the surfaces of foreign bodies introduced into the organism (Donlan, 2011;Sander et al., 2012). Th...
“…Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) Considering the proteolytic characteristic described for papain and the biopolymer matrix composition of bacterial biofilms, this study aimed to evaluate the ability of papain to act as an inhibitor of biofilms in different concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) found this activity for Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa only in 10% of papain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies reported papain antibacterial activity in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012). Nonetheless, Ferreira et al (2008) verified that only papain gel 10% was able to inhibit S. aureus.…”
Section: Determination Of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (Mic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, biofilms can also be found in wounds, which makes the treatment more difficult and increases wound bioburden (Kim, Steinberg, 2012;Percival et al, 2012;Dowd, 2008). Moreover, previous experimental and clinical data have recommended using papain to reduce wound bioburden and to promote wound healing (Payne et al, 2008).Although bactericidal activity of papain has been reported for gram-positive and gram-negative organisms (Dawkins et al, 2003;Chukwuemeka, Anthoni, 2010;Bhardwaj, Ballal, Velmurugan, 2012), there is no consensus about this function. Ferreira et al (2008) Considering the proteolytic characteristic described for papain and the biopolymer matrix composition of bacterial biofilms, this study aimed to evaluate the ability of papain to act as an inhibitor of biofilms in different concentrations.…”
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus (MRSHa) are important coagulase-negative staphylococci. They are often isolated from bacteremia in humans mainly due to their ability to form biofilm on the surfaces of medical devices. Papain is a complex mixture of proteolytic enzymes and peroxidases extracted from the latex of Carica papaya and it is recognized by accelerating the healing process of wounds. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the MRSE and MRSHa isolates to produce biofilms. Besides this, the ability of papain to inhibit the formation of biofilms or to disrupt the ones already formed by those bacteria was analyzed. Thirty MRSHa and 30 MRSE were isolated from bacteremia and used in this study. It was observed that papain has ability to reduce biofilms formed by MRSE (p < 0.06) and by MRSHa (p = 0.0005). In addition, papain was able to disrupt mature biofilms made by MRSE (p = 0.014). No antibacterial activity of papain was observed for any isolates of MRSE and MRSHa tested. Papain has been demonstrated as a potential product for reducing biofilm.
Uniterms:Staphylococcus epidermidis/methicillin-resistant. Staphylococcus haemolyticus/methicillinresistant. Biofilm/production. Papain/reducing biofilm.Staphylococcus epidermidis resistente à meticilina (MRSE) e Staphylococcus haemolyticus resistente à meticilina (MRSHa) são importantes estafilococos coagulase negativa. São frequentemente isolados em bacteremia humana, principalmente devido à capacidade de formar biofilmes nas superfícies de dispositivos médicos introduzidos no organismo. A papaína é mistura complexa de enzimas proteolíticas e peroxidases extraídas do látex de Carica papaya, reconhecida por acelerar os processos de cura de feridas. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a capacidade dos MRSE e MRSHa em produzir biofilmes e analisar a capacidade da papaína em inibir a formação de biofilme ou desintegrar biofilmes já formados por essas bactérias. Observou-se que a papaína tem capacidade de reduzir a formação de biofilme por MRSE (p < 0,06) e MRSHa (p = 0,0005). Além disso, a papaína foi capaz de desintegrar biofilme maduro formado por MRSE (p = 0,014). Nenhuma atividade antibacteriana da papaína foi observada para qualquer das duas espécies de bactérias testadas. A papaína mostrou-se produto potencial para reduzir biofilme.Unitermos: Papaína. Staphylococcus epidermidis/resistente à meticilina. Staphylococcus haemolyticus/ resistente à meticilina. Biofilme/produção. Papaína/redução de biofilme.
INTRODUCTIONCoagulase-negative staphylococci, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis followed by Staphylococcus haemolyticus, have been frequently reported as significant etiological agents that cause nosocomial infections (Keim et al., 2011, Kristóf et al., 2011Rosado, Romanelli, Camargos, 2011). The most important property of these staphylococci is their capability to form biofilm on the surfaces of foreign bodies introduced into the organism (Donlan, 2011;Sander et al., 2012). Th...
“…Bhardwaj et al 19 evaluated the antimicrobial activity of three natural extracts and chlorhexidine 2%. They observed that chlorhexidine eliminated 100% of microorganisms, followed by the natural extracts.…”
Objective: to investigate the antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of the calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] + propylene glycol (PG) + aloe vera (AV) paste in comparison with other pastes used as intracanal medication. Material and Methods: there was evaluated 3 intracanal medication based on calcium hydroxide and propylene glycol, varying only the third component. In group 1, the third component was camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CPMC); in group II, chlorhexidine (CHX); and in group III, aloe vera. The antimicrobial activity was analyzed through the direct contact of the intracanal medication pastes with strains of Enterococcus faecalis; Kocuria rhizophila; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. The biocompatibility was evaluated in subcutaneous tissue of rats during experimental 7, 21 and 63 days. Results: it was observed that the Group II showed the best results regarding antimicrobial activity, followed by group III and I. The Ca(OH)2 + PG + AV paste was considered biocompatible since it presented discrete fibrosis and suggestive histological characteristics of normal healing after 63 days, approaching the control group. Conclusion: the association of Ca (OH)2 + PG + AV showed antibacterial activity and adequate biocompatibility when compared with commonly pastes used as intracanal medication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.