2006
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2006.9706566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Suture Materials and Suture Techniques for the Management of Traumatic Teat Lesions in Buffaloes

Abstract: Tiwary, R., Hoque, M., Maiti, S.K., Singh, G.R. and Kumar, N. 2006. Comparative evaluation of suture materials and suture techniques for the management of traumatic teat lesions in buffaloes. J. Appl. Anim.Res., 29: 33-36. To evaluate two suture materials and techniques in teat surgery, sixteen buffaloes with teat lesions were divided into four equal groups. Internal suturing included single layer continuous lockstitch with catgut 3-0 (group A), single layer continuous lockstitch with polyglycolic acid (PGA) 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequent complications that are encountered upon conventional suturing techniques were suture line leakage and dehiscence of suture line because of the minimum suture holding capacity of the tissue. Success rate of teat surgery is mainly dependant on suture quality and effective drainage [4] . Post-operative wound dehiscence was found to be less in wounds apposed with surgical staples, when compared to conventionally sutured wounds [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent complications that are encountered upon conventional suturing techniques were suture line leakage and dehiscence of suture line because of the minimum suture holding capacity of the tissue. Success rate of teat surgery is mainly dependant on suture quality and effective drainage [4] . Post-operative wound dehiscence was found to be less in wounds apposed with surgical staples, when compared to conventionally sutured wounds [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%