Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Framework in STEM Intensive Programs for Secondary and Tertiary Education

Abstract

Sustainability of learning environments is a key pillar of all societal development frameworks. A variety of research address the development of education as a fine balanced relation between flexibility, adaptability, innovation, and efficient resource allocation. The main limitation of current approaches is the lack of correlation between various efficiency analyses and budget expenditure of learning environments. The current research aims at undertaking a comparative evaluation of a sustainable framework in STEM intensive programs for secondary and tertiary education. This was done using several established methods like the Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle for the development main framework, the Analytic Hierarchy Process for efficiency evaluation and Value Analysis for budget expenditure allocations and improvement identification. The main framework is based on learning objectives defined in accordance with Blooms’ revised taxonomy and student feedback was collected through surveys and group feedback. The main results of the study show that the framework had overall efficiencies over the 80% threshold in both secondary and tertiary education, whilst some of the components scored under 65%, identifying immediate improvement features. Further research involves the transition to an online and mixed teaching environment, by adapting the content and framework structure with the aid of smart learning environments.

Becoming future-proof STEM teachers for enhancing sustainable development: A proposed general framework for capacity-building programs in future studies

“…(para. 6) Although STEM education should have more innovative and, indeed, more anticipatory roles in identifying global grand challenges and should be future-oriented, it is difficult—and sometimes impossible—for STEM teachers to forecast global grand challenges and translate forecasting results into workable capstone projects that require Future Studies (FS) concepts, methodologies, tools, methods, and skills (Tanenbaum et al, 2016 ). The competencies that STEM teachers must obtain are future-scaffolding STEM competencies relevant to STEM related disciplines, which will empower students to think creatively about the future (Levrini et al, 2019 ).…”

Remodeling the STEM Curriculum for Future Engineers

“…Meanwhile, sustainable STEM education echoes the aforementioned needs. Today, the movement in higher education integrates reformed knowledge, innovation, and practice while considering the humanities, ethical issues, social learning, and civic engagement with a learning process that is exploratory, action-oriented, reflective, and transformative [21]. While the curriculum has been rapidly reformed at the primary and middle school levels toward STEM, the movement has prompted higher education to change and make their ways of teaching more multifaceted [22].…”

Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for National Student Survey: Actionable Insights from Textual Feedback to Enhance Quality of Teaching and Learning in UK’s Higher Education

“…Furthermore, the vast majority of existing SET studies use Likert-scale responses to capture student feedback, yet, by its very nature, the response to a close-ended question cannot provide as detailed and as in-depth information as that to an open-ended question [16][17][18] and may sometimes result in an ambiguous finding [19]. For example, one study that aimed to analyze student responses to the NSS 2005/07 open-ended questions [20] revealed that the most frequent issue raised in students' free-text responses pertains to the 'Overall quality of teaching', reporting that the NSS's open-ended questions help to improve the overall response rate.…”