Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study into the comparative response of wiper and round-nose conventional carbide inserts coated with TiCN + AL2O3 + TiN when turning an AISI 4340 steel alloy. The optimal process parameters, as identified by pre-experiments, were used for both types of inserts to determine the machined surface quality, tool wear, and specific cutting energy for different cutting lengths. The wiper inserts provided a substantial improvement in the attainable surface quality compared with the results obtained using conventional inserts under optimal cutting conditions for the entire range of the machined lengths. In addition, the conventional inserts showed a dramatic increase in roughness with an increased length of the cut, while the wiper inserts showed only a minor increase for the same length of cut. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the wear for both types of inserts. Conventional inserts showed higher trends for both the average and maximum flank wear with cutting length compared to the wiper inserts, except for lengths of 200–400 mm, where conventional inserts showed less average flank wear. A higher accumulation of deposited chips was observed on the flank face of the wiper inserts than the conventional inserts. The experimental results demonstrated that edge chipping was the chief tool wear mechanism on the rake face for both types of insert, with more edge chipping observed in the case of the conventional inserts than the wiper inserts, with negligible evidence of crater wear in either case. The wiper inserts were shown to have a higher specific cutting energy than those detected with conventional inserts. This was attributed to (i) the irregular nose feature of the wiper inserts differing from the simpler round nose geometry of the conventional inserts and (ii) a higher tendency of chip accumulation on the wiper inserts.

Experimental and Numerical Studies of Tool Wear Processes in the Nibbling Process

“…Cryogenic treatment can also be used to increase the hardness of the stamps. The authors of the work in [ 4 ] showed that it is possible to increase the hardness of punches by about 2%…”

“…It should be free of burrs and there should be no concentration of large plastic strains. The quality of the obtained product depends on many process parameters, such as the lubrication method, cutting speed, tool geometry, cutting clearance, punch material properties and punch wear [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”

Analysis of the Impact of Wiper Geometry Insert on Surface Roughness and Chips in Machining Materials Used in the Aviation Industry

“…Nevertheless, it should be stated that hardness of materials has a significant impact for the tool life [21]. On the other hand advantages of Wiper inserts relative to conventional ones are more relevant when the cutting tool wear proceed [22]. The authors emphasize that the obtained surface roughness value is similar to that obtained in the grinding process [23,24].…”

Effect of Different Cooling Strategies on Surface Quality and Power Consumption in Finishing End Milling of Stainless Steel 316

“…In general, heat is generated during machining operation due to plastic deformation in the shear zones and friction. Consequently, high-temperature gradients are developed, resulting in tool wear [ 13 ], which, in turn, causes shattering tool failure. In order to overcome such catastrophic failures, numerous cooling techniques like flood coolant [ 14 ] and high-pressure coolant systems [ 15 ] are used during the milling process [ 16 ].…”