2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06596-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of supervised machine learning algorithms in the prediction of the relative density of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KNN, STR, and GPR will not be recommended as they are considered the worst-performing algorithms here. [76] Minimum error artificial data were generated for processing, and the method used here is flexible and considered best for evaluating the tribo-parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…KNN, STR, and GPR will not be recommended as they are considered the worst-performing algorithms here. [76] Minimum error artificial data were generated for processing, and the method used here is flexible and considered best for evaluating the tribo-parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collected from 13 references of 316L SS parts processed by SLM Python TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Google Colab [76] e ANN with BP is applied along with ANOVA to decide the potential parameters to predict the specific wear rate reduction.…”
Section: Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, 316 L stainless steel (SS) is perhaps the most common ferrous alloy used in SLM today (Amanov, 2020). The density, surface quality, microstructure and mechanical properties in the 316 L stainless steel SLM were (2020) and reported by several other authors (Barrionuevo et al, 2021;La Fé-Perdomo et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2021). The authors declare the influence of process parameters in building 316 L structures at various building orientations and for which the fracture toughness was measured.…”
Section: Ferrous-based Alloysmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several of the most popular algorithms were used in this study. Decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, Gaussian process, and multi-layer perceptron were accurately detailed in [33]. Extreme gradient boosting regressor (XGBRegressor) is an optimized distributed gradient boosting library designed to be highly efficient, flexible, and portable [34].…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-fold Cross-validation (CV) was employed to avoid overfitting during the training process [23], [37]. To assess the prediction accuracy, Barrionuevo et al [33] introduced an index of merit (IM), which combines multiple metrics to get a unique metric of the algorithms' accuracy.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%