2018
DOI: 10.22159/ijap.2018v10i1.21960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Selected Polymers and Plasticizer on Transdermal Drug Delivery System

Abstract: Objective: The present work was aimed at preparation of transdermal patches by a solvent casting method using a varying concentration of polymers i.e. methocel (K15 and K100), ethocel (4 and 10), gelatin, chitosan, eudragit (RL and RS) grade using plasticizer (glycerin and propylene glycol).Methods: The ratio of drug to polymers and plasticizer was varied and the effect of formulation variables was studied. Prepared transdermal patches were evaluated for physicochemical properties, in-vitro permeation studies,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrophilic polymers absorb moisture faster and to a greater extent than the hydrophobic polymers thus formulation batches F1 to F3 gave high moisture uptake value. Sethi et al [17] in their research also got similar results with a hydrophilic polymer. Percentage moisture uptake value of all formulation batches have given in table 5.…”
Section: Percentage Moisture Uptakementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Hydrophilic polymers absorb moisture faster and to a greater extent than the hydrophobic polymers thus formulation batches F1 to F3 gave high moisture uptake value. Sethi et al [17] in their research also got similar results with a hydrophilic polymer. Percentage moisture uptake value of all formulation batches have given in table 5.…”
Section: Percentage Moisture Uptakementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, the technique for the controlled release of drugs through TDDS is more efficient, appealing, and successful [16]. The transdermal patch shows to be beneficial compared to other drug delivery system, due to the following reasons [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]:…”
Section: Description About Tddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…first-pass metabolism, toxic metabolite formation, poor absorption, gastrointestinal irritation, etc. • TDDS is useful for medications that have a short half-life to prevent repeated dosing • Simplified medicines reduce inter and intra-patient variability • For unconscious patients with dysphagia or constipation, TDDS has a more significant advantage • Avoiding of pre-systemic metabolism leads to a reduction in the amount and, thus, a reduction in adverse effects in acute liver toxicity • The absorption of the drug can be terminated by withdrawing transdermal devices at any point in time • TDDS is usually cost-effective as patches, designed to deliver 1-7-day medications as compared with other treatments • In comparison with the nasal cavity, it provides a relatively wide range of applications [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Description About Tddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best formulation was selected by physicochemical properties and was subjected to further studies 13 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Transdermal Patchmentioning
confidence: 99%