2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13071251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Microwave L-Band VOD and Optical NDVI for Agriculture Drought Detection over Central Europe

Abstract: Agricultural droughts impose many economic and social losses on various communities. Most of the effective tools developed for agricultural drought assessment are based on vegetation indices (VIs). The aim of this study is to compare the response of two commonly used VIs to meteorological droughts—Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) vegetation optical depth (VOD). For this purpose, meteorological drought… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is the comparison of VIs with meteorological drought indices. It has been shown that the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Vegetation Optical Depth (VOD) could capture agricultural drought events in response to meteorological droughts within Europe [27]. In addition, it has been found that meteorological drought indices for shorter periods were associated with crop stress (defined via the Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Vegetation Health Index (VHI)), while longer accumulation periods correlated better with the vegetation status of forest areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is the comparison of VIs with meteorological drought indices. It has been shown that the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Vegetation Optical Depth (VOD) could capture agricultural drought events in response to meteorological droughts within Europe [27]. In addition, it has been found that meteorological drought indices for shorter periods were associated with crop stress (defined via the Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and Vegetation Health Index (VHI)), while longer accumulation periods correlated better with the vegetation status of forest areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated the potential of vegetation parameters such as VOD to monitor drought impact on vegetation, particularly on forests (Konings et al, 2021), such as the Amazon in 2005, 2010 and 2015 (Saatchi et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2018;Petchiappan et al, 2022), and on tree mortality (Rao et al, 2019). Over croplands and pastures only very few studies have been performed using coarse resolution data, mostly passive microwave-based VOD (Buitink et al, 2020;Afshar et al, 2021;Likith et al, 2022) or the active microwave-based slope from the backscatter incidence angle relationship (Schroeder et al, 2016;Vreugdenhil et al, 2017;Steele-Dunne et al, 2019;Petchiappan et al, 2022). Most studies investigate satellite observations such as backscatter and brightness temperature directly, or use VOD.…”
Section: Vegetation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a two-and threeweek lag was observed between decreasing SM and decreasing VOD and NIRv, respectively. Afshar et al (2021) assessed the potential of SMOS L-VOD (SMOS-IC v2) in comparison to NDVI for monitoring agricultural drought. Here standardized VOD and NDVI for drought and non-drought periods based on a 12-month SPI were compared.…”
Section: Anomaly Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that droughts occurred almost every year but with varying severity. Afshar et al ( 2021 ) calculated meteorological droughts using SPI in more than 24,000 pixels with a spatial resolution of 0.25 × 0.25 located in Central Europe. They compared the heterogeneous mean values of VIs in dry and wet periods resulting from meteorological droughts statistically to evaluate the ability of VIs in drought conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%