2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03592-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of microbial profiles of oral samples obtained at different collection time points and using different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there is little consensus about the required fasting time before donating saliva for oral microbiota analysis. Some authors have used prolonged fasting periods [ 47 , 48 ] and others have used and suggested shorter periods [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. In this study, time since last eating or drinking was not associated with microbiota composition in the overall model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is little consensus about the required fasting time before donating saliva for oral microbiota analysis. Some authors have used prolonged fasting periods [ 47 , 48 ] and others have used and suggested shorter periods [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. In this study, time since last eating or drinking was not associated with microbiota composition in the overall model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral samples were collected from the participants before the start of chemotherapy and 8 to 20 days after the start of chemotherapy using the oral rinse method, which we have previously reported [11]. Brie y, the participants were instructed to gargle 5 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution (Fuso Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) for 10 s and then spit the solution into sterile tubes.…”
Section: Oral Sample Collection and Oral Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dna Extraction, 16s Rrna Sequencing, And Taxonomic Classi cation DNA extraction, 16S rRNA sequencing, and taxonomic classi cation were performed as described previously [11], with some modi cations. Brie y, the oral samples were homogenized with glass beads using a homogenizer (Disruptor Genie, Scienti c Industries, Bohemia, NY, USA).…”
Section: Oral Sample Collection and Oral Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…하게 추출할 수 있으나 함유된 RNA 및 단백질의 양이 적어 추출에 어려움이 있을 수 있다 [73][74][75] . 최근 협점막 도말과 구강 린스는 구강 마이크로바이옴 수집에 흔하게 활용되고 있다 [76][77][78][79] . 특히 구강 린스는 구강 마이크로바이옴의 전반적인 양 상을 대표하는 검체를 얻는데 타액보다 우수하다고 한다 79,80) .…”
Section: 협점막 도말 및 구강 린스 검체에서 대상자의 Dna를 간편unclassified