2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of microbial and chemical leaching processes for heavy metal removal from dewatered metal plating sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology followed in this study has been previously Sari 16197 described in details (Bayat and Sari, 2010a). Therefore, the materials and methods were concisely described herein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodology followed in this study has been previously Sari 16197 described in details (Bayat and Sari, 2010a). Therefore, the materials and methods were concisely described herein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physicochemical characteristics of the dewatered sludge samples are presented in Table 1. All analyses were carried out in duplicate (Bayat and Sari, 2010a, b). The biological leaching experiments were carried out in a completely mixed batch (CMB) reactor with a volume of 3 L and dimensions of 15 cm inner diameter (ID) and 17 cm height equipped with pH and temperature controllers, a stirrer, and an aerator system (Figure 1) (Bayat and Sari, 2010a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 presents the leaching efficiencies achieved in a comparative study. Bayat and Sari [22] proved that bioleaching was more effective than chemical leaching by Fe(III) or sulfuric acid. Escobar et al [23] also reported higher removal efficiencies by biological means than that of chemical leaching with inorganic acids (i.e., sulfuric).…”
Section: Overview Of Organisms and Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal removal efficiencies obtained by chemical (i.e., sulfuric or ferric chloride leaching) and bioleaching using A. ferrooxidans. The results were obtained at optimum operating conditions: pH, 2; pulp density, 2% (w/v); agitation speed, 120 rpm; and, temperature, 25 ± 2 • C. Data obtained from Bayat and Sari 2010 [22]. …”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioleaching technology applies the direct effect of natural microorganisms or the indirect effect of metabolites for oxidation, reduction, complexation, adsorption, or dissolution to separate and leach insoluble components in solid phases [2,3]. Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and T. thiooxidans are the most important autotrophic microorganisms in bioleaching technology, whereas heterotrophic microorganisms are widely applied in leaching technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%