2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of Mg?Ni hydrogen absorbing materials prepared by mechanical alloying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice (desorption pressure > 1 atm), the desorption plateau length at the lowest temperature in this work was about 3.2 wt% (1.4 atm, 255 • C). It was noticed that the PCI performance of the Mg 2 Ni alloy produced by IECP is similar to that of the Mg 2 Ni alloy obtained by other published methods [17][18][19].…”
Section: Productssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In practice (desorption pressure > 1 atm), the desorption plateau length at the lowest temperature in this work was about 3.2 wt% (1.4 atm, 255 • C). It was noticed that the PCI performance of the Mg 2 Ni alloy produced by IECP is similar to that of the Mg 2 Ni alloy obtained by other published methods [17][18][19].…”
Section: Productssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The effects of the crystallite size of Mg (or MgH 2 ) is clearly highlighted in this figure. The product of ball-milled Mg metal exhibits good desorption properties as it takes only 15 min to get a full desorption for the nanocrystalline Mg [16]. Almost the same properties have been found for the Mg + Co mixtures but at 20 • C higher in temperature.…”
Section: Hydrogen Absorption and Desorption Properties Of Various MIXsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Surface areas of powders were measured using ASAP 2020 BET accelerated surface area and porosimetry system. Sample mass of 8 g was used for measuring the hydrogen storage properties using a facility reported earlier [8].…”
Section: Alloy Synthesis and Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%