1983
DOI: 10.1080/01635588309513797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of methods of collecting food intake data for cancer epidemiology studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each 4-day record consisted of each subject's report of food and beverages consumed on a Saturday, a Sunday and two weekdays. Our previous stud ies [ 10,11 ] demonstrated that the food record was the most valid and reliable of the commonly used methods of meas uring nutrient intake when the actual quantity of foods consumed is not weighed. Participants were asked not to complete food records for any days that did not represent their usual food habits.…”
Section: Diet Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each 4-day record consisted of each subject's report of food and beverages consumed on a Saturday, a Sunday and two weekdays. Our previous stud ies [ 10,11 ] demonstrated that the food record was the most valid and reliable of the commonly used methods of meas uring nutrient intake when the actual quantity of foods consumed is not weighed. Participants were asked not to complete food records for any days that did not represent their usual food habits.…”
Section: Diet Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately significant quantitative differences in estimated lycopene intake may be observed if different databases are used in analyzing the results of the same food intake questionnaire although qualitatively individuals are similarly ranked in terms of high or low intake of lycopene. 24 Thus, self reported food questionnaires and estimation of lycopene intake calculated from databases thereafter does appear to rank intake correctly 40,41 but lacks quantitative accuracy. It does seem that such food questionnaires cannot be used confidently to estimate the lycopene (or indeed any carotenoid) content of the prostate however.…”
Section: Dietary Sources Of Lycopenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven-day food records with written instructions were used to measure average daily nutrient intake for selected nutrients. Food records were used be cause they represent more valid and reliable estimates of actual nutrient intake of groups and individuals than other methods of assessing dietary intake [6,7], Nutranal 3.1 θ computer software (SN Services, Denver, CO), which con tains USDA food composition information as well as manufacturers' data, was used to calculate the nutrient content of all diets. Supplements were not included in estimating total nutrient intake in order to evaluate the adequacy of food intake and food choices. "…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%