Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-16-228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Genomic and Laboratory Approaches for Determination of Shiga Toxin Subtypes in Escherichia coli

Abstract: The determination of Shiga toxin (ST) subtypes can be an important element in the risk characterization of foodborne ST-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates for making risk management decisions. ST subtyping methods include PCR techniques based on electrophoretic or pyrosequencing analysis of amplicons and in silico techniques based on whole genome sequence analysis using algorithms that can be readily incorporated into bioinformatics analysis pipelines for characterization of isolates by their genetic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered the possibility that ARG detection may be more sensitive using raw-read sequences as this would alleviate errors arising from repeat regions and assembly of contaminating agents impacting genome assembly as has been observed in other studies (Carrillo et al, 2016;Clausen et al, 2016;Low et al, 2019). Assembly tools were found to have an impact on the ability to detect ARGs, particularly at low genome coverage where percentages of correctly identified genes were significantly lower in SKESA-assemblies.…”
Section: Requirements For Wgs-based Arg Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the possibility that ARG detection may be more sensitive using raw-read sequences as this would alleviate errors arising from repeat regions and assembly of contaminating agents impacting genome assembly as has been observed in other studies (Carrillo et al, 2016;Clausen et al, 2016;Low et al, 2019). Assembly tools were found to have an impact on the ability to detect ARGs, particularly at low genome coverage where percentages of correctly identified genes were significantly lower in SKESA-assemblies.…”
Section: Requirements For Wgs-based Arg Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This real-time WGS approach produces high-resolution characterization of bacterial pathogens at a cost and within a timeframe that are similar to standard microbiological techniques and has the potential to replace lengthy biochemical characterization and molecular and serological typing procedures widely used in food testing laboratories. Our laboratory is currently studying strategies for broad implementation of WGS technology in support of regulatory food inspection objectives through the detection, identification, and characterization of priority bacterial pathogens such as STEC, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes [5,[23][24][25]. We have developed guidelines and implemented validated methods and bioinformatics tools for automated analyses of sequence data to ensure reliability and reproducibility of WGS-based analyses [24,26].…”
Section: Enter the Next Generation: Whole-genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are readily discoverable through the analysis of WGS data. For instance, the Shiga toxin subtype can be reliably determined using the V-typer tool, which is an automated assembly-independent subtyping module that can be integrated in a bioinformatics pipeline for the analysis of foodborne STEC isolates [23]. Yet another possibility would be to define priority STEC on the basis of contemporary public health data (reviewed periodically) identifying STEC serogroups most frequently associated with illness in a given jurisdiction.…”
Section: Is It Dangerous? Rapid Identification Of Virulence Antimicrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, WGS can inform investigators about numerous infectious pathogen traits in a single "assay", often with reduced turnaround time and with improved analytical power. As such, public health and food safety authorities are undergoing a historic transition, as WGS-based applications increasingly replace many molecular and phenotypic assays, ranging from serotyping and other molecular level microbial characterization for pathogen identification and surveillance as well as outbreak response, to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and virulence prediction for risk assessment (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%