2009
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of four mosquitoes sampling methods in rice irrigation schemes of lower Moshi, northern Tanzania

Abstract: Background: Adult malaria vector sampling is the most important parameter for setting up an intervention and understanding disease dynamics in malaria endemic areas. The intervention will ideally be species-specific according to sampling output. It was the objective of this study to evaluate four sampling techniques, namely human landing catch, pit shelter, indoor resting collection and odour-baited entry trap.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with data from several studies comparing the efficacy of HLC with a diverse range of mosquito collection methods [32,33]. Indeed during HLC, mosquitoes are attracted by both visual and chemical stimuli, whereas CDC light traps use only visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation is consistent with data from several studies comparing the efficacy of HLC with a diverse range of mosquito collection methods [32,33]. Indeed during HLC, mosquitoes are attracted by both visual and chemical stimuli, whereas CDC light traps use only visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the fact that HLC was undertaken outdoors while CDC LT was conducted indoors could have overestimated the efficiency of HLC compared with CDC LT. Because of the personal and property related security issues in Douala, household owners did not permit us to conduct indoor HLC; this prompted us to adjust the study design, whereby HLC was conducted exclusively outdoors while CDC LT continued to be placed indoors. The number of species collected fluctuated substantially between the two methods but was in agreement with previous studies that have indicated that the efficiency of a collection method can vary according to the composition of the mosquito species present, mosquito densities, availability of alternative hosts, and city lighting [33-35]. The sampling efficiency of both collection methods was found to be independent of vector abundance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Chemoprophylaxis has been shown to be very effective in preventing malaria in non-immune travelers as well as in semi-immune populations living in malaria endemic areas. [9][10][11] Despite many attempts to find a suitable replacement for the HLC, [12][13][14] none have consistently proven to be as sensitive and as versatile as the HLC, and given the risks of malaria infection and illness, the use of the HLC remains controversial. Increasingly, ethical review committees are reluctant to approve studies that include the use of HLCs given the concern about increased risk of disease among collectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have used the landing of mosquitoes as proxies for attraction (e.g. Dia et al , 2005; Kweka & Manhande, 2009), but few studies have identified specific cues inducing mosquitoes to land. Oxocarboxylic acids in human sweat were identified as chemical cues associated with landing in An.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%