2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9567-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Five Culture Media with Triplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Hence, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MRSA is a vital constituent of control measures. The present study evaluated five different methods for the identification of MRSA. A total of 207 S. aureus clinical isolates that consisted of 89 MRSA and 118 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains confirmed by PCR were tested. MRSA strains were evaluated by five differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by low levels of expression of mecA due to the presence of small subpopulations that were not detected by phenotypic methods. Alternatively, the mecA gene may be defective in these isolates (28). We did not detect isolates expressing nonmecA-mediated resistance to oxacillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This could be explained by low levels of expression of mecA due to the presence of small subpopulations that were not detected by phenotypic methods. Alternatively, the mecA gene may be defective in these isolates (28). We did not detect isolates expressing nonmecA-mediated resistance to oxacillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“… 39 In contrast, polymerase chain reaction has greater sensitivity for MRSA identification, but because of hospital capacity limitations, we did not use this technique for MRSA screening. 40 , 41 Second, we used only a single sampling site, the nares, which has a lower incidence of MRSA recovery than throat swabs and tracheal aspirates. Sampling multiple sites for culture has also been shown to increase MRSA-detection sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%