2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also noticed that the BSS was greater in the FLACS group; however, this difference did not reach the threshold of statistical significance. Research has suggested that FLACS can effectively reduce EPT and CDE, properties related to the laser-assisted fragmentation and softening of the lens [32]. In our investigation, we specifically excluded patients with moderate to severe cataract and scans signal strength index of < 50 to acquire high-quality image; this may be why we did not observe differences in CDE and EPT between the groups in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We also noticed that the BSS was greater in the FLACS group; however, this difference did not reach the threshold of statistical significance. Research has suggested that FLACS can effectively reduce EPT and CDE, properties related to the laser-assisted fragmentation and softening of the lens [32]. In our investigation, we specifically excluded patients with moderate to severe cataract and scans signal strength index of < 50 to acquire high-quality image; this may be why we did not observe differences in CDE and EPT between the groups in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…FLACS can provide better precision and predictability over manual phacoemulsification, 8 especially in challenging cases with a shallow anterior chamber, subluxated cataracts, or an iris coloboma with a narrow pupil in a microphthalmic eye, as in our case. 9 On the other hand, it requires more time and costs more. Also, it may induce miosis and a weaker capsulorhexis compared to manual capsulorhexis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of FLACS has provided cataract patients and surgeons with several benefits, especially in challenging cases. [8][9][10][11][12] Crema et al reported FLACS to be effective in patients with weak zonular and even lens subluxation and useful in preventing further zonular damage. 8 Vasavada et al concluded that compared to conventional phacoemulsification, FLACS showed a lesser decrease in endothelial cell density, less inflammation, and better vision in the early postoperative period in patients with a shallow anterior chamber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Vasavada et al concluded that compared to conventional phacoemulsification, FLACS showed a lesser decrease in endothelial cell density, less inflammation, and better vision in the early postoperative period in patients with a shallow anterior chamber. 9 Additionally, compared with conventional phacoemulsification, FLACS has an advantage in managing hard nuclear and white cataracts. 10,11 Furthermore, in unusual cataracts, such as posterior polar cataracts, FLACS has shown enhanced safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%