2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of existing and new methods for correcting ocular artifacts in electroencephalographic recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The window segments that contained the eye blink artefacts were automatically rejected based on the method shown in [17,18]. A DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) was applied with Haar mother wavelet as it resembles eye blink artefacts.…”
Section: Eog Artefacts Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The window segments that contained the eye blink artefacts were automatically rejected based on the method shown in [17,18]. A DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) was applied with Haar mother wavelet as it resembles eye blink artefacts.…”
Section: Eog Artefacts Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A confusion matrix generally involves the following parameters: The following aggregate metrics can then be calculated based on the above parameters. The criteria for performance evaluation are usually employed in biomedical studies, which include three parts: sensitivity (the proportion of the total number of labeled ictal EEGs that are correctly classified), specificity (the proportion of the total number of labeled inter-ictal EEGs that are correctly classified), and classification accuracy (the proportion of the total number of EEG signals that are correctly classified) [2,[6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15][16][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]34,35,[38][39][40][41]49,53,59].…”
Section: Performance Evaluation-confusion Matrix Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent components wavelet independent components (WICs) extracted during the processing of the dataset affected by eye blink artifacts. 4 …”
Section: Artifactual Epochs Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new method for artifact removal from single-channel EEG recordings using nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) in a Gaussian source separation framework was introduced by Damon et al [3], who focused their study only on ocular artifacts. A laudable comparison of different existing methods was made by Kirkove et al [4], who identified 11 existing methods for dealing with ocular artifacts. They have carried out a comparative performance evaluation of the resulting 27 distinct methods using a common set of data and a common set of metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%