2020
DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of electrocardiographic effects of different doses of medetomidine and xylazine in calf-camels (Camelus dromedarius)

Abstract: This experimental, prospective, randomised, and blinded study aimed to perform comparative evaluation of electrocardiographic (ECG) effects of different doses xylazine and medetomidine in dromedary calves after intravenous (IV) administration. A total of twenty five clinically and paraclinically healthy male dromedary calves aged 15±2 weeks and weighing 95±5.5 kg were assigned randomly to five different groups (four experimental and one control). Groups XL and XH received a low (0.2 mg kg-1) and high (0.4 mg k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, all clinical variables and ECG indices at baseline were within the physiological range of camelide which was reported by Samimi et al (2019) and Samimi et al (2020), respectively. No significant changes in clinical variables and ECG indices were observed in any of the groups in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, all clinical variables and ECG indices at baseline were within the physiological range of camelide which was reported by Samimi et al (2019) and Samimi et al (2020), respectively. No significant changes in clinical variables and ECG indices were observed in any of the groups in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…(2019) and Samimi et al. (2020), respectively. No significant changes in clinical variables and ECG indices were observed in any of the groups in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations