Comparative evaluation of effect of chlorhexidine application on dentin bond strength with two different adhesives after ER, CR: YSGG phototherapy: an in vitro study

Ozdemir, Zeyneb Merve; Surmelioglu, Derya Gursel

doi:10.1007/s10103-023-03878-z

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although universal adhesive systems have shown promise, the Clearfil SE bond, which incorporates 10-methacryolyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) functional monomer, remains the gold standard in self-etch adhesive systems [ 29 ]. The chemical bonding between 10-MDP in the adhesive system and calcium (Ca) within the hydroxyapatite structure forms a hybrid layer that is more resistant to hydrolytic degradation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems

Atilan Yavuz,

Erturk Avunduk,

Karatas

et al. 2024

Lasers Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of light-cured and self-cured adhesives on enamel surfaces selectively etched with Er, Cr: YSGG laser or 35% phosphoric acid. A total of 60 class V cavities were prepared 1 mm above the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1: Clearfil SE Bond with no conditioning, Group 2: Tokuyama Universal Bond with no conditioning, Group 3: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 4: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 5: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and Group 6: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Microleakage was evaluated qualitatively (visually) and quantitatively (ImageJ). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23 and submitted to Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. In all evaluation methods, the microleakage scores exhibit significant differences (p*<0.001). Group 1 and Group 3 exhibited similar and lower microleakage values than the Group 5. In the occlusal margin, the microleakage values were similar in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 6, whereas in the gingival margin Group 4 showed significantly lower leakage compared to Group 2. Regardless of the etching protocols and adhesive systems used, less microleakage was observed on the occlusal surface than on the gingival surface. Phosphoric acid etching provides better results than laser etching for enamel surface treatment on both occlusal and gingival surfaces.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%