2020
DOI: 10.31782/ijcrr.2020.122122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Different Staining Techniques for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major disadvantage of SSM is its low sensitivity (22%-80%) depending on Bacilli count and false-positive results. Fluorescence microscopy and front-loaded smear microscopy (spot-spot microscopy) further facilitated increased sensitivity to sputum smear [19]. Whilst these methods could not efficiently detect TB in children and HIV or immunocompromised patients due to low Mtb count.…”
Section: Sputum Smear Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major disadvantage of SSM is its low sensitivity (22%-80%) depending on Bacilli count and false-positive results. Fluorescence microscopy and front-loaded smear microscopy (spot-spot microscopy) further facilitated increased sensitivity to sputum smear [19]. Whilst these methods could not efficiently detect TB in children and HIV or immunocompromised patients due to low Mtb count.…”
Section: Sputum Smear Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%