2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11607.5674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract: Background: The advent of laparoscopic surgery has benefited the patient and surgeon; however creation of pneumoperitoneum for same has bearings during the perioperative period. These effects of pneumoperitoneum are associated with significant haemodynamic changes, increasing the morbidity of the patient. Aim:The present study compared the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients aged 20-60 y, American Soc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[7,8] A study compared hemodynamic responses after dexmedetomidine and esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and found lower HR with dexmedetomidine. [9] Similar to our results, a previous study also reported that the intraoperative blood pressure values were significantly reduced in the dexmedetomidine 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg groups compared with the control group. [6] The blood pressure in dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower after intubation, after reversal and post-operative recovery as compared to placebo group in another study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7,8] A study compared hemodynamic responses after dexmedetomidine and esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and found lower HR with dexmedetomidine. [9] Similar to our results, a previous study also reported that the intraoperative blood pressure values were significantly reduced in the dexmedetomidine 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg groups compared with the control group. [6] The blood pressure in dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower after intubation, after reversal and post-operative recovery as compared to placebo group in another study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…There was no significant increase in blood pressure in dexmedetomidine group, compared to pre-operative levels during pneumoperitoneum, while it was a significant increase in control group during pneumoperitoneum period (P < 0.05). [9] Similarly, dexmedetomidine was superior to propofol in reducing HR and blood pressure during laparoscopic surgery. [8] A delay in recovery for first few hours post-extubation after using dexmedetomidine has been reported earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] Earlier reports demonstrated that patients benefit a lot from perioperative application of Dex, such as reduced stress response during incubation and operation, and hemodynamic stability. [9,10] However, the effects of Dex on gastrointestinal function remain controversial. Some researchers demonstrated that Dex could protect intestine from injury caused by intestinal I/R and endotoxemia, [11,12] whereas others found that Dex would prolong the gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in the rat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Its usefulness in prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation has been the interest of present research. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Propofol is the most commonly used J Evid Based Med Healthc, pISSN-2349-2562, eISSN-2349-2570/ Vol. 2/Issue 59/Dec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%