Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Crack After Root Canal Preparation Using TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid Files: An In Vitro Study

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study was to assess and compare the dentinal microcracks produced by TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid files during root canal preparation.Material and methods: In this in vitro investigation, four groups of 25 samples each were assembled from 100 mandibular premolar teeth. Using TruNatomy, Neoendo Flex, and Neoendo Neohybrid files, or leaving the teeth unprepared (control), the teeth underwent root canal preparation. Horizontal sections were taken at different distances from the apex to analyze dentinal cracks. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the existence or lack of cracks, and chi-square tests were performed on the data.Results: In the control group, there were no cracks. TruNatomy files created fewer cracks compared to Neoendo Flex and Neoendo Neohybrid files.Conclusions: This in vitro investigation demonstrates that the root surface might acquire dentinal cracks as a result of nickel-titanium instruments. Compared to Neoendo Flex and Neoendo Neohybrid files, TruNatomy showed a decreased incidence of cracks. However, it is important to note that these conclusions are limited to the scope of this study.