2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Volume Between Patients With Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia and Class III Dentofacial Deformity

Abstract: Hyperplastic condyles were similar in volume to the condyles of patients with mandibular prognathism, suggesting that patients with a Class III skeletal relation could exhibit bilateral condylar hyperplasia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings support the statement that the TMJ is related to facial morphology. Goulart et al [25] indicated that the condylar volume in subjects with mandibular prognathism was similar to subjects with unilateral condylar hyperplasia, concluding that the facial morphology in subjects with skeletal class III could be related to the presence of a bilateral condylar hyperplasia [26]. Likewise, our results show that the coronal distance of the condyle is significantly greater in subjects with skeletal class III, thereby supporting the previous conclusion of Goulart et al [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings support the statement that the TMJ is related to facial morphology. Goulart et al [25] indicated that the condylar volume in subjects with mandibular prognathism was similar to subjects with unilateral condylar hyperplasia, concluding that the facial morphology in subjects with skeletal class III could be related to the presence of a bilateral condylar hyperplasia [26]. Likewise, our results show that the coronal distance of the condyle is significantly greater in subjects with skeletal class III, thereby supporting the previous conclusion of Goulart et al [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The 3D volumetric depiction depends on the appropriateness of the segmentation, bone voxel threshold, and accurate suppression of surrounding tissue values to enhance the structure of interest. 35 Tecco et al, 36 Saccucci et al, 11 and Lin et al 37 have used the isolated condylar head by removing the condylar neck, considering that this area is well-associated with the growing mandibular process. However, their identification of the base of the condylar shape changing from ellipsoidal to circular cannot be accurately defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the volume of soft tissues are related to other disorders, such as metabolic bone pathologies, including CH that may involve changes in condylar anatomy. 11,12,23 Goulart et al 24 evaluated the condylar volume in patients with UCH compared to Class III malocclusion patients. They concluded that in UCH patients the affected condyle presented a higher volume than the contralateral condyle, while in the Class III group the condylar volume was equal for both sides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%