Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/vppc.2016.7791631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Bidirectional Dual Active Bridge DC-DC Converter Variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the measured efficiency of the prototype is 96.27% at full load condition. The peak efficiencies of 94.8% at 2.8 kW [24], 95.5% at 1.2 kW [25], 96.5% at 1.2 kW [26], 96.71% at 1 kW [16] can be found in the literature of three‐level isolated bidirectional DC–DC converters. Therefore, the proposed 3LTT‐IBDC seems more promising in terms of achieving high efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the measured efficiency of the prototype is 96.27% at full load condition. The peak efficiencies of 94.8% at 2.8 kW [24], 95.5% at 1.2 kW [25], 96.5% at 1.2 kW [26], 96.71% at 1 kW [16] can be found in the literature of three‐level isolated bidirectional DC–DC converters. Therefore, the proposed 3LTT‐IBDC seems more promising in terms of achieving high efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structure using half-and fullbridge topologies with both I-type primary and I-type secondary side of the transformer has also been studied in [19,20] that examine the control strategy and zero voltage switching (ZVS) of these topologies. In addition, the other structures have also been studied in the literature which are T-type only in the primary side of the transformer in [21] and T-type only in the secondary side of the transformer in [22][23][24]. Also, T-type switching combination topologies are stated in [24] as more efficient topology than I-type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A symmetric modulation‐based 3‐5 Level multilevel DAB (MLDAB) having NPC as a secondary side with the capacitor voltage balancing has been presented in [19]. In [20], a detailed comparison of three different DAB topologies named as 3‐3 Level HB–HB, 3‐5 Level HB–NPC and 3‐5 Level HB‐T‐type leg has been reported. It was concluded that 3‐5 Level FB‐T‐type will be a good choice out of three topologies due to low AC‐link losses and good utilisation of the semiconductor area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%