2018
DOI: 10.15713/ins.idmjar.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficiency of marketed children’s fluoridated toothpastes at diluted concentrations against Streptococcus mutans - An in vitro study

Abstract: Background: Dentifrices containing fluoride are known to possess anticarious benefits and are also used for enamel remineralization. A dentifrice is the best source of fluoride for children. However, there seems to be a risk of dental fluorosis as children tend to consume passable amount of fluoride from toothpastes itself. Due to the deliberate swallowing of toothpaste and the menace of fluorosis, dentifrices with lower fluoride concentrations for young children are developed and marketed. Aim: The objective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the low-fluoride dentifrices tested in the study exhibited varying antimicrobial activity against S. mutans . This is in accordance with the findings of Malhotra et al 6 and Lodaya et al 7 who observed antimicrobial activity of low-fluoride dentifrices against S. mutans .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the low-fluoride dentifrices tested in the study exhibited varying antimicrobial activity against S. mutans . This is in accordance with the findings of Malhotra et al 6 and Lodaya et al 7 who observed antimicrobial activity of low-fluoride dentifrices against S. mutans .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the contrary, NaF combinations interact with the filler particles, and thereby, the availability of active fluoride is reduced. 6 , 7 This could explain the effectiveness of sodium MFP observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%