2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202858
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of a new magnetic bead-based DNA extraction method from fecal samples for downstream next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Abstract: We are colonized by a vast population of genetically diverse microbes, the majority of which are unculturable bacteria that reside within the gastrointestinal tract. As affordable, advanced next-generation sequencing technologies become more widely available, important discoveries about the composition and function of these microbes become increasingly possible. In addition to rapid advancement in sequencing technologies, automated systems have been developed for nucleic acid extraction; however, these methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA was isolated from 75 mg of fecal pellets according to a fecal sample-based adaptation to a Maxwell® RSC PureFood GMO and Authentication Kit (Catalog No. AS1600; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), as previously described 39 . Concentrations were determined fluorometrically using the QuantiFluor® ONE dsDNA System (Promega Corporation) on a Quantus TM fluorometer (Promega Corporation), and purity was assessed via 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios as determined by spectrophotometry (Epoch TM , BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was isolated from 75 mg of fecal pellets according to a fecal sample-based adaptation to a Maxwell® RSC PureFood GMO and Authentication Kit (Catalog No. AS1600; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), as previously described 39 . Concentrations were determined fluorometrically using the QuantiFluor® ONE dsDNA System (Promega Corporation) on a Quantus TM fluorometer (Promega Corporation), and purity was assessed via 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios as determined by spectrophotometry (Epoch TM , BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 However, there is also evidence of A 260 /A 230 ratios greater than 1.6 for extracted DNA samples using the QIAmp PowerFecal and Maxwell RSC PureFood GMA Authentication kits, but both of these methods use columnbased extraction as opposed to bead-based. 54 Overall, the GTC present in the Binding Solution and Wash 1 buffers had the greatest effect on the sample purity, measured by the A 260 /A 230 ratio, but other contaminants such as ethanol which make up a large percentage of Wash 2 can also influence the absorbance readings if not properly removed from the sample. 52 In addition to the use of EOF significantly improving the purity of the extracted cfDNA, it was noted that using the microfluidic separator also improved the purity even without the electric field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When comparing the results of this study to others, it appears that the low A 260 / A 230 ratio is seen as a characteristic of other DNA extraction kits as well, including the MagaZorb DNA Mini‐Prep Kit, which showed an average A 260 / A 230 ratio below 1 across the samples presented 53 . However, there is also evidence of A 260 / A 230 ratios greater than 1.6 for extracted DNA samples using the QIAmp PowerFecal and Maxwell RSC PureFood GMA Authentication kits, but both of these methods use column‐based extraction as opposed to bead‐based 54 . Overall, the GTC present in the Binding Solution and Wash 1 buffers had the greatest effect on the sample purity, measured by the A 260 / A 230 ratio, but other contaminants such as ethanol which make up a large percentage of Wash 2 can also influence the absorbance readings if not properly removed from the sample 52…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic beads method is the most commonly used technique for DNA extraction for NGS analysis (McGaughey et al 2018). This method greatly simplifies the extraction procedure and improves the size selection process.…”
Section: Genomic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%