2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of 3D printed components for deviations in dimensional and geometrical features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various printing technologies, the masked stereolithography (MSLA) and digital light processing (DLP) exploit the use of a photocurable ink to fabricate 3D objects under UV light exposure. , However, the objects produced by these methods are electrically insulating, thus limiting their potential in those applications requiring electrical signal transmission like some biomedical devices, soft robotics, and stretchable electronics. To overcome this limitation, several strategies have been investigated to make the printer inks conductive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various printing technologies, the masked stereolithography (MSLA) and digital light processing (DLP) exploit the use of a photocurable ink to fabricate 3D objects under UV light exposure. , However, the objects produced by these methods are electrically insulating, thus limiting their potential in those applications requiring electrical signal transmission like some biomedical devices, soft robotics, and stretchable electronics. To overcome this limitation, several strategies have been investigated to make the printer inks conductive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the width of the narrow section and the length of the specimen were greater than the expected nominal values, suggesting that the standard automatic compensation system for thermal shrinkage is adequate and meets the needs of the evaluated systems, as noted by Huang, Zhang, and Bhandari 59 . The shrinkage evaluation is extremely important for 3D printing, especially in the FDM process, due to the need to accurately reproduce of the parts following the pre‐defined dimensions in the computational stage 60,61 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…59 The shrinkage evaluation is extremely important for 3D printing, especially in the FDM process, due to the need to accurately reproduce of the parts following the predefined dimensions in the computational stage. 60,61…”
Section: Dimensional Changes Of the Printed Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of errors occurs when the setting in CURA is not optimal. Meanwhile, the results of research by Gaikwad et al showed an excellent texture when using PLA and PVA 3D printer filaments [24]. In the future, we plan to use multipurpose inserts to fabricate phantom ACR breasts based on 3D printing.…”
Section: Calculation Of Cnr and Snrmentioning
confidence: 96%