2010
DOI: 10.3109/10715761003782288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative EPR study of different macrophage types stimulated for superoxide and nitric oxide production

Abstract: Despite the major impact of ROS on human health, their quantification remains difficult and requires an analytical approach, such as the EPR spin trap technique. In this study, a comparative EPR analysis of different macrophage types stimulated for superoxide and nitric oxide production was performed. U937 monocytes, J774A.1, RAW 264.7 and primary mouse (PMM) macrophages were included. In contrast to the U937 cells, all macrophages produced significant EPR signals after stimulation. The use of PMA as stimulato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although LPS is known to stimulate ROS production in neutrophils, the reports of LPS-induced ROS generation in macrophages have been controversial in the literature (Szefler et al, 1989;Pfeiffer et al, 2007;Deschacht et al, 2010;Maeda et al, 2010). In contrast, zymosan consistently stimulates ROS generation in macrophages (Russwurm et al, 1994;Bramble and Anderson, 1998) and thus was used as a positive ROS stimulus in our studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although LPS is known to stimulate ROS production in neutrophils, the reports of LPS-induced ROS generation in macrophages have been controversial in the literature (Szefler et al, 1989;Pfeiffer et al, 2007;Deschacht et al, 2010;Maeda et al, 2010). In contrast, zymosan consistently stimulates ROS generation in macrophages (Russwurm et al, 1994;Bramble and Anderson, 1998) and thus was used as a positive ROS stimulus in our studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The EPR method for the detection of the overall O 2 ●− and NO production in infected and non-infected macrophages was used as described earlier (Deschacht et al 2010). PMM were grown in 24-well plates (Greiner) at 1 × 10 6 cells/well 2 days prior to the test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the effect of cysteamine on extracellular ROS generation in PMAstimulated RAW macrophages using the well established chemiluminescence assay. 21,22 Cysteamine reduced ROS generation by 33% in PMA-stimulated macrophages ( Figure 6A). Because the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is an important inherent function of macrophages, we measured intracellular oxidant generation in macrophages cocultured with apoptotic renal tubular cells.…”
Section: Cysteamine Modulates Reactive Oxygen Species Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%