2018
DOI: 10.14741/ijcet/v.8.2.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Enactment of Fluorocarbon-free and Fluorocarbon-based Water Repellent Finishes on Cotton Single Jersey Fabrics

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of such a finish, in the case of PA/PES material, although it had the highest linear density of weft and warp, but also the lowest thickness ( Table 2 ), contributed to a significant decrease in water repellency after the first wash ( Figure 5 ). These observations are consistent with the findings of Schellenberger et al [ 10 ], Chowdhury et al [ 18 ], and Davies [ 19 ], who showed that hydrophobic finishes devoid of fluorocarbon compounds have lower efficiency and durability, compared to fluorocarbon finishes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of such a finish, in the case of PA/PES material, although it had the highest linear density of weft and warp, but also the lowest thickness ( Table 2 ), contributed to a significant decrease in water repellency after the first wash ( Figure 5 ). These observations are consistent with the findings of Schellenberger et al [ 10 ], Chowdhury et al [ 18 ], and Davies [ 19 ], who showed that hydrophobic finishes devoid of fluorocarbon compounds have lower efficiency and durability, compared to fluorocarbon finishes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Alternative compounds are increasingly being used to impart hydrophobic properties to materials, including short-chain SFPs or non-fluorinated finishes (PFC-free finishes), which include paraffins, silicones, dendrimer chemicals, and nanoparticles [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. However, as was shown by the results of Schellenberger et al [ 10 ], Chowdhury et al [ 18 ], and Davies [ 19 ], hydrophobic finishes devoid of fluorocarbon compounds have mostly lower durability, compared to fluorocarbon finishes. The study conducted by W.L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%