2009
DOI: 10.3376/038.034.0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Efficacy of Three Suction Traps for Collecting Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Open Habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of a source of CO 2 can therefore improve catches by increasing the effective range of the sampling area of a light trap (Veronesi et al, 2007;Erisoz Kasap et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2011). Depending on the species, adding olfactory attractants (such as octenol), replacing incandescent bulbs with a long wave ultraviolet light source or inverting the light traps were found to increase the collection size (Faiman et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2011). STICKY TRAPS - fig.…”
Section: Operational Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a source of CO 2 can therefore improve catches by increasing the effective range of the sampling area of a light trap (Veronesi et al, 2007;Erisoz Kasap et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2011). Depending on the species, adding olfactory attractants (such as octenol), replacing incandescent bulbs with a long wave ultraviolet light source or inverting the light traps were found to increase the collection size (Faiman et al, 2009;Kline et al, 2011). STICKY TRAPS - fig.…”
Section: Operational Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traps were suspended in the downdraft position, with the trap entrance approximately 50 cm above the ground. This is the standard method for sand fly surveillance in Israel (Faiman et al 2009, Orshan et al 2010. Trapping took place during the waning moon phase, weather permitting.…”
Section: Collection and Identification Of Sand Fliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second point to consider is the selection of CDC light traps instead of sticky traps. Sticky traps are suitable and widely used for standard monitoring of phlebotomine sand ßies (Faiman et al 2009), but CDC light traps have proven even more efÞcient for sand ßy capture; Hilmy et al (1989) found that CDC light traps were the most efÞcient in capturing Phlebotomus spp. in Egypt, and Veronesi et al (2007) demonstrated the higher efÞciency of CO 2 -baited light traps in capturing Phlebotomus perfiliewi in comparison with sticky traps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%