2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01074-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of Neuraxial and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract: Background: The choice of anesthesia technique remains debatable in patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of neuraxial (epidural/spinal) versus general anesthesia on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: Medline, Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify eligible studies focused on the comparison between neuraxial and general anesthesia in hip fracture patients bet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
46
3
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
9
46
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 Furthermore, recent prospective studies have shown no significant association between the anesthesia method and the incidence of pneumonia or mortality in hip fracture surgery. 29,30 The results of the present study are consistent with the results of these recent reports. In the present study, the frequencies of atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pulmonary edema were very low, and there were no significant differences between the anesthesia groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27,28 Furthermore, recent prospective studies have shown no significant association between the anesthesia method and the incidence of pneumonia or mortality in hip fracture surgery. 29,30 The results of the present study are consistent with the results of these recent reports. In the present study, the frequencies of atelectasis, pneumothorax, and pulmonary edema were very low, and there were no significant differences between the anesthesia groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results of recent retrospective and prospective studies may support this third reason. [27][28][29][30] Fourth, many elderly patients with hip fractures are frail and suffer from cognitive impairment or chronic constipation. In frail patients, the muscles used to exhale vomit are presumed to be weak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the patients undergoing GA are theoretically more likely to develop POD. Unexpectedly, the results of anesthesia mode associated with POD incidence are not consistent based on previous studies ( 11 ). Thus, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of GA vs. RA on the incidence of delirium in adult patients undergoing surgery.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, more patients undergoing GA theoretically tend to develop POD. Interestingly, compared with RA, the patients receiving GA did not show significant POD incidence according to some studies ( 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both general anesthesia (GA) and neuraxial anesthesia have been widely used till date. However, meta-analysis studies have failed to demonstrate a significant difference in outcomes with the two methods ( 6 ). While neuraxial anesthesia is preferred for majority patients, it may not be routinely used especially in elderly patients under anticoagulant therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%