2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.850221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Septic Shock: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract: Background: Septic shock is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Studies have reported that Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) in combination with Western medicine (WM) were more favorable. However, the debate on optimal CHIs is ongoing. The objective of this study is to explore the comparative effectiveness of CHIs for septic shock.Methods: We retrieved data from the English and Chinese databases with retrieval time from database inception to 30 September 2021. Network meta-analysis was performed, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistencies were reported if the Bayesian P values were greater than 0.05 after using the node-splitting method. Each therapy was given a rank based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) (worst = 0%; best = 100%) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistencies were reported if the Bayesian P values were greater than 0.05 after using the node-splitting method. Each therapy was given a rank based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) (worst = 0%; best = 100%) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%