Comparative effects of test‐enhanced learning and self‐explanation on long‐term retention

Abstract

CONTEXT Educators often encourage students to engage in active learning by generating explanations for the material being learned, a method called self-explanation. Studies have also demonstrated that repeated testing improves retention. However, no studies have directly compared the two learning methods.METHODS Forty-seven Year 1 medical students completed the study. All students participated in a teaching session that covered four clinical topics and was followed by four weekly learning sessions. In the learning sessions, students were randomised to perform one of four learning activities for each topic: testing with self-generated explanations (TE); testing without explanations (T); studying a review sheet with self-generated explanations (SE), and studying a review sheet without explanations (S). Students repeated the same activity for each topic in all four sessions. Six months later, they took a free-recall clinical application test on all four topics.RESULTS Repeated testing led to better longterm retention and application than repeatedly studying the material (p < 0.0001, g 2 = 0.33). Repeated generation of self-explanations also improved long-term retention and application, but the effect was smaller (p < 0.0001, g 2 = 0.08). When data were collapsed across topics, both testing conditions produced better final test performance than studying with self-explanation (. Studying with selfexplanation led to better retention and application than studying without selfexplanation (SE = 29% > S = 20%; p = 0.001, d = 0.68). Our analyses showed significant interaction by topic (p = 0.001, g 2 = 0.06), indicating some variation in the effectiveness of the interventions among topics.CONCLUSIONS Testing and generating selfexplanations are both learning activities that can be used to produce superior long-term retention and application of knowledge, but testing is generally more effective than selfexplanation alone.

Pharmacy Student Self-Testing as a Predictor of Examination Performance

“…16,21,22 An evaluation of first-year medical students validated this finding in a professional health program. 23 There may also be additional benefit to using multiplechoice self-testing questions when multiple-choice questions are the primary evaluation tool used by the course. Furthermore, in professional programs such as pharmacy, familiarity with strategies for correctly answering multiplechoice questions may result in students being better prepared for taking standardized tests such as the North American Pharmacists Licensure Examination and the Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination.…”

Demonstration-based training (DBT) in the design of a video tutorial for software training

“…A considerable number of studies on the testing effect have revealed otherwise. They have found that testing can yield better retention in the long run than restudying (Karpicke and Roediger 2007;Larsen et al 2013). One explanation offered for the testing effect is that it consolidates learning by strengthening the memory trace (e.g., Brewer et al 2010).…”

Assessment Pearls for Competency-Based Medical Education

“…Individuals tested on material have improved recall, compared to those who simply studied the material. 21 Similarly, assessment drives learning in the workplace: when learners see that all aspects of being a physician are being assessed, the importance of mastering those nonmedical expert competencies becomes apparent. Assessment strategies should therefore be designed with this in mind.…”