2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/807625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effects of Different Disturbances in Coral Reef Habitats in Moorea, French Polynesia

Abstract: Degradation and loss of critical coastal habitats has significant ramifications for marine fisheries, such that knowledge of changes in habitat quality and quantity are fundamental to effective ecosystem management. This study explores changes in the structure of coral reef habitats, specifically changes in coral cover and composition, in Moorea, French Polynesia, to assess the independent and combined effects of different disturbances since 1979. During this period, reefs on the north coast have been subject … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(124 reference statements)
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome was likely due to the small diel variation in pCO 2 that we detected (69 versus 85 µatm at upstream and downstream habitats), which is much lower than the very large daily variation in pCO 2 recently recorded in reef waters at Lady Elliot Island, Australia (Shaw et al 2012). While it is currently unknown why upstream−downstream variation in pCO 2 in reef waters in Moorea was so small at the time of measurement, it is possible that contempo-rary values reflect the low coral cover in the back reef of Moorea (Edmunds et al 2010, Trapon et al 2011), the strong cross reef transport of seawater in Moorea that lessens residence time of water over the reef (e.g. Rosman & Hench 2011), and the greater depth of water (~2 m) compared to Lady Elliot Island (~0.4 m) where diel pCO 2 variation is strongly developed (Shaw et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome was likely due to the small diel variation in pCO 2 that we detected (69 versus 85 µatm at upstream and downstream habitats), which is much lower than the very large daily variation in pCO 2 recently recorded in reef waters at Lady Elliot Island, Australia (Shaw et al 2012). While it is currently unknown why upstream−downstream variation in pCO 2 in reef waters in Moorea was so small at the time of measurement, it is possible that contempo-rary values reflect the low coral cover in the back reef of Moorea (Edmunds et al 2010, Trapon et al 2011), the strong cross reef transport of seawater in Moorea that lessens residence time of water over the reef (e.g. Rosman & Hench 2011), and the greater depth of water (~2 m) compared to Lady Elliot Island (~0.4 m) where diel pCO 2 variation is strongly developed (Shaw et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, outbreaks of Acanthaster spp. are a major contributor to sustained declines in coral cover and degradation of coral reefs at many locations throughout the Indo west-Pacific (Osborne et al 2011;Trapon et al 2011;De'ath et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, outbreaks of Acanthaster spp. are a major contributor to sustained declines in coral cover and degradation of coral reefs at many locations throughout the Indo west-Pacific (Osborne et al 2011;Trapon et al 2011;De'ath et al 2012).While there has been considerable research, and a larger number of scientific articles (>940) focused on Acanthaster spp., extending back to the 1960s (Goreau 1964;Pearson and Endean 1969), research interest (and funding) has waxed and waned through this period (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations