1996
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of argon green and krypton red laser photocoagulation for patients with diabetic exudative maculopathy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As longer wavelengths have deeper retinal and choroidal penetration [36], one can assume that red laser causes less tissue damage than diode laser. As red laser has been demonstrated to be as effective as green laser in retinopathy management [37,38,39] and because its wavelength lies between the green and diode laser, we hypothesized that it can be a safer and at least as effective option as diode laser for the treatment of ROP. Our study supports this hypothesis by showing equal efficacy of red and diode lasers, while red laser causes less myopic shift, which seems to be attributable to less tissue damage resulting from less tissue penetrance of this laser type into the choroid and retina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As longer wavelengths have deeper retinal and choroidal penetration [36], one can assume that red laser causes less tissue damage than diode laser. As red laser has been demonstrated to be as effective as green laser in retinopathy management [37,38,39] and because its wavelength lies between the green and diode laser, we hypothesized that it can be a safer and at least as effective option as diode laser for the treatment of ROP. Our study supports this hypothesis by showing equal efficacy of red and diode lasers, while red laser causes less myopic shift, which seems to be attributable to less tissue damage resulting from less tissue penetrance of this laser type into the choroid and retina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%